From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756077AbbAZPxA (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:53:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55610 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752894AbbAZPw5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:52:57 -0500 From: Paul Moore To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Al Viro , Guenter Roeck , linux-fsdevel , linux-audit@redhat.com, rgb@redhat.com, sd@queasysnail.net, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Overhaul the audit filename handling Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:52:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1670043.82pCAlqBeA@sifl> Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.16.7-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20150122045303.1347.98054.stgit@localhost> <20150123053056.GC29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, January 24, 2015 10:03:06 AM Sedat Dilek wrote: > I have tested vfs.git#getname2 on top of Linux v3.19-rc5-184-gc4e00f1 > (plus block-loopmq patchset) and it boots fine on Ubuntu/precise > amd64. Great, thank you for the additional testing. > Just curious, where will this audit-filename-handling overhaul go through? > Through Paul's audit-next or Al's vfs-next tree? Al wanted to carry the patchset so that is where it lives now, you should see it arrive in Linus' tree via the VFS tree. -- paul moore security @ redhat