From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: micrel: Change handler interrupt for lan8814
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 03:40:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167306281658.4583.1807795313935970592.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104194218.3785229-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 20:42:18 +0100 you wrote:
> The lan8814 represents a package of 4 PHYs. All of them are sharing the
> same interrupt line. So when a link was going down/up or a frame was
> timestamped, then the interrupt handler of all the PHYs was called.
> Which is all fine and expected but the problem is the way the handler
> interrupt works.
> Basically if one of the PHYs timestamp a frame, then all the other 3
> PHYs were polling the status of the interrupt until that PHY actually
> cleared the interrupt by reading the timestamp.
> The reason of polling was in case another PHY was also timestamping a
> frame at the same time, it could miss this interrupt. But this is not
> the right approach, because it is the interrupt controller who needs to
> call the interrupt handlers again if the interrupt line is still
> active.
> Therefore change this such when the interrupt handler is called check
> only if the interrupt is for itself, otherwise just exit. In this way
> save CPU usage.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: phy: micrel: Change handler interrupt for lan8814
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7abd92a5b98f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-07 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 19:42 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: micrel: Change handler interrupt for lan8814 Horatiu Vultur
2023-01-07 3:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167306281658.4583.1807795313935970592.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox