From: tridge@samba.org
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: performance of filesystem xattrs with Samba4
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:21:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16799.57253.861765.512175@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <419F6D1F.10001@namesys.com>
Hans,
A bit more information about the slowdown between runs (and eventual
lockup) with reiser4 that I reported in my last email.
I found that a umount/mount between runs solved the problem, leading
to a fairly consistent result and no lockup. I also found that running
a simple /bin/sync between runs solved the problem.
This implies to me that it is some in-memory structure that is the
culprit. I can't see anything obvious in /proc/slabinfo, but its been
a while since I've done any serious kernel development so maybe I just
don't know what to look for.
I also tried enabling the "strict sync" option in Samba4. This makes
the 1% flush operations in the load file map to fsync() instead of a
noop. This caused reiser4 to lockup almost immediately, with the same
symptoms as the previous lockups I reported (all smbd processes stuck
in D state). No oops messages or anything unusual in dmesg.
Cheers, Tridge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-21 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <16759.16648.459393.752417@samba.org>
2004-10-21 18:32 ` [PATCH] Re: idr in Samba4 Jim Houston
2004-10-22 6:17 ` tridge
2004-11-19 7:38 ` performance of filesystem xattrs with Samba4 tridge
2004-11-19 8:08 ` James Morris
2004-11-19 10:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-11-19 11:43 ` tridge
2004-11-19 22:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-11-22 13:02 ` tridge
2004-11-22 21:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-11-19 12:03 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-11-19 12:43 ` tridge
2004-11-19 14:11 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-11-20 10:44 ` tridge
2004-11-20 16:20 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-20 23:29 ` tridge
2004-11-19 15:34 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-19 15:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-11-19 22:03 ` tridge
2004-11-20 4:51 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-19 23:01 ` tridge
2004-11-20 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-21 1:14 ` tridge
2004-11-21 2:12 ` tridge
2004-11-21 23:53 ` tridge
2004-11-23 9:37 ` tridge
2004-11-23 17:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-11-24 7:53 ` tridge
2004-11-20 4:40 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-20 6:47 ` tridge
2004-11-20 16:13 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-20 23:16 ` tridge
2004-11-21 2:36 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-21 0:21 ` tridge [this message]
2004-11-21 2:41 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-21 1:53 ` tridge
2004-11-21 2:48 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-21 3:19 ` tridge
2004-11-21 6:11 ` Hans Reiser
2004-11-21 22:21 ` Nathan Scott
2004-11-21 23:43 ` tridge
2004-12-03 17:49 Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16799.57253.861765.512175@samba.org \
--to=tridge@samba.org \
--cc=Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox