From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mtd_blkdevs: add option to enable scanning for partitions
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:44:53 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1691046252.219046.1668109493753.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2rgbfpYfpbLKHaf@makrotopia.org>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Daniel Golle" <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_PARTITIONS) || mtd_type_is_nand(new->mtd))
> + gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
I know that NAND should not get used with mtdblock because lack of wearleveling and
in general too many writes. But what exactly is the rationale to deny part scanning for NAND?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-10 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 23:04 [PATCH v4 4/5] mtd_blkdevs: add option to enable scanning for partitions Daniel Golle
2022-11-09 12:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-11-09 13:10 ` Daniel Golle
2022-11-10 19:44 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2022-11-10 20:04 ` Daniel Golle
2022-11-10 20:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2022-11-11 0:39 ` Daniel Golle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1691046252.219046.1668109493753.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox