From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: wintera@linux.ibm.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com,
gbayer@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 18/18] net/smc: add interface implementation of loopback device
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 23:16:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1695568613-125057-19-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1695568613-125057-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
This patch completes the specific implementation of loopback device
for the newly added SMC-D DMB-related interface.
The loopback device always provides mappable DMB because the device
users are in the same OS instance.
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
net/smc/smc_loopback.h | 5 +++
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
index 8375575..e9d2d62 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
}
dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
+ refcount_set(&dmb_node->refcnt, 1);
again:
/* add new dmb into hash table */
@@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
}
hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ atomic_inc(&ldev->dmb_cnt);
dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
@@ -140,18 +142,27 @@ static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
- /* remove dmb from hash table */
- write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ /* find dmb from hash table */
+ read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
dmb_node = tmp_node;
+ dmb_node->freeing = 1;
break;
}
}
if (!dmb_node) {
- write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ /* wait for dmb refcnt to be 0 */
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&dmb_node->refcnt))
+ wait_event(ldev->dmbs_release, !refcount_read(&dmb_node->refcnt));
+
+ /* remove dmb from hash table */
+ write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
@@ -159,9 +170,69 @@ static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
kfree(dmb_node);
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ldev->dmb_cnt))
+ wake_up(&ldev->ldev_release);
return 0;
}
+static int smc_lo_attach_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+ /* find dmb_node according to dmb->dmb_tok */
+ read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok && !tmp_node->freeing) {
+ dmb_node = tmp_node;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!dmb_node) {
+ read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ refcount_inc(&dmb_node->refcnt);
+ read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ /* provide dmb information */
+ dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
+ dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
+ dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
+ dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
+ dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_detach_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 token)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+ /* find dmb_node according to dmb->dmb_tok */
+ read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, token) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == token) {
+ dmb_node = tmp_node;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!dmb_node) {
+ read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dmb_node->refcnt))
+ wake_up_all(&ldev->dmbs_release);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_get_dev_attr(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
+{
+ return BIT(ISM_ATTR_DMB_MAP);
+}
+
static int smc_lo_add_vlan_id(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 vlan_id)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -194,7 +265,15 @@ static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok, unsigned int idx
{
struct smc_lo_dmb_node *rmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
-
+ struct smc_connection *conn;
+
+ if (!sf) {
+ /* local sndbuf shares the same physical memory with
+ * peer RMB, so no need to copy data from local sndbuf
+ * to peer RMB.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ }
read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) {
if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) {
@@ -210,13 +289,10 @@ static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok, unsigned int idx
memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size);
- if (sf) {
- struct smc_connection *conn =
- smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
+ conn = smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
+ if (conn && !conn->killed)
+ smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn);
- if (conn && !conn->killed)
- smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn);
- }
return 0;
}
@@ -253,6 +329,8 @@ static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
.query_remote_gid = smc_lo_query_rgid,
.register_dmb = smc_lo_register_dmb,
.unregister_dmb = smc_lo_unregister_dmb,
+ .attach_dmb = smc_lo_attach_dmb,
+ .detach_dmb = smc_lo_detach_dmb,
.add_vlan_id = smc_lo_add_vlan_id,
.del_vlan_id = smc_lo_del_vlan_id,
.set_vlan_required = smc_lo_set_vlan_required,
@@ -264,6 +342,7 @@ static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
.get_local_gid = smc_lo_get_local_gid,
.get_chid = smc_lo_get_chid,
.get_dev = smc_lo_get_dev,
+ .get_dev_attr = smc_lo_get_dev_attr,
};
static struct smcd_dev *smcd_lo_alloc_dev(const struct smcd_ops *ops,
@@ -343,6 +422,9 @@ static int smc_lo_dev_init(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
smc_lo_generate_id(ldev);
rwlock_init(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
hash_init(ldev->dmb_ht);
+ atomic_set(&ldev->dmb_cnt, 0);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&ldev->dmbs_release);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&ldev->ldev_release);
return smcd_lo_register_dev(ldev);
}
@@ -376,6 +458,8 @@ static int smc_lo_dev_probe(void)
static void smc_lo_dev_exit(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
{
smcd_lo_unregister_dev(ldev);
+ if (atomic_read(&ldev->dmb_cnt))
+ wait_event(ldev->ldev_release, !atomic_read(&ldev->dmb_cnt));
}
static void smc_lo_dev_remove(void)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
index a5b501b..e42c807 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct smc_lo_dmb_node {
u32 sba_idx;
void *cpu_addr;
dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+ refcount_t refcnt;
+ u8 freeing : 1;
};
struct smc_lo_dev {
@@ -40,6 +42,9 @@ struct smc_lo_dev {
DECLARE_BITMAP(sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS);
rwlock_t dmb_ht_lock;
DECLARE_HASHTABLE(dmb_ht, SMC_LODEV_DMBS_HASH_BITS);
+ atomic_t dmb_cnt;
+ wait_queue_head_t dmbs_release;
+ wait_queue_head_t ldev_release;
};
#endif
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-24 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-24 15:16 [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/18] net/smc: decouple ism_dev from SMC-D device dump Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/18] net/smc: decouple ism_dev from SMC-D DMB registration Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/18] net/smc: extract v2 check helper from SMC-D device registration Wen Gu
2023-09-28 3:08 ` Jan Karcher
2023-09-30 8:41 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/18] net/smc: support SMCv2.x supplemental features negotiation Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/18] net/smc: reserve CHID range for SMC-D virtual device Wen Gu
2023-09-28 3:08 ` Jan Karcher
2023-09-28 9:10 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-10-04 8:27 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/18] net/smc: extend GID to 128bits only for virtual ISM device Wen Gu
2023-10-12 7:54 ` Dust Li
2023-10-12 13:24 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/18] net/smc: disable SEID on non-s390 architecture Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/18] net/smc: enable virtual ISM device feature bit Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/18] net/smc: introduce SMC-D loopback device Wen Gu
2023-09-25 11:50 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-25 13:29 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-25 14:20 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-25 13:57 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-25 15:18 ` Dust Li
2023-09-26 7:24 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-28 3:16 ` Jan Karcher
2023-09-28 18:35 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-29 14:08 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-10-04 9:05 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/18] net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback Wen Gu
2023-10-18 13:24 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/18] net/smc: implement some unsupported " Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/18] net/smc: implement DMB-related " Wen Gu
2023-09-24 23:29 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-25 1:47 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/18] net/smc: register loopback device as SMC-Dv2 device Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/18] net/smc: add operation for getting DMB attribute Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 15/18] net/smc: add operations for DMB attach and detach Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 16/18] net/smc: avoid data copy from sndbuf to peer RMB in SMC-D Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v4 17/18] net/smc: modify cursor update logic when sndbuf mapped to RMB Wen Gu
2023-09-24 15:16 ` Wen Gu [this message]
2023-09-26 7:30 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism Alexandra Winter
2023-09-27 15:16 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-28 8:56 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-28 17:29 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-29 13:31 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-10-04 8:42 ` Wen Gu
2023-09-28 16:42 ` Wen Gu
2023-10-05 8:21 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-10-08 7:19 ` Wen Gu
2023-10-17 3:49 ` Wen Gu
2023-10-18 19:43 ` Wenjia Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1695568613-125057-19-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox