From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: owl: Add support for kernel debugger
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:56:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16ff435f-9172-e01d-dfe6-7aa8575c4bd6@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ee88060c129715980592a1ae33c93923916a14b.1590766726.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Hi,
Am 29.05.20 um 17:50 schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
> Implement poll_put_char and poll_get_char callbacks in struct uart_ops
> that enables OWL UART to be used for KGDB debugging over serial line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> index c2fa2f15d50a..26dcc374dec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/console.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -20,13 +21,13 @@
> #include <linux/tty.h>
> #include <linux/tty_flip.h>
>
> -#define OWL_UART_PORT_NUM 7
> -#define OWL_UART_DEV_NAME "ttyOWL"
> +#define OWL_UART_PORT_NUM 7
> +#define OWL_UART_DEV_NAME "ttyOWL"
>
> -#define OWL_UART_CTL 0x000
> -#define OWL_UART_RXDAT 0x004
> -#define OWL_UART_TXDAT 0x008
> -#define OWL_UART_STAT 0x00c
> +#define OWL_UART_CTL 0x000
> +#define OWL_UART_RXDAT 0x004
> +#define OWL_UART_TXDAT 0x008
> +#define OWL_UART_STAT 0x00c
Please do not unnecessarily re-indent kernel code. You can do so when
you're actually adding something new.
>
> #define OWL_UART_CTL_DWLS_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
> #define OWL_UART_CTL_DWLS_5BITS (0x0 << 0)
> @@ -461,6 +462,34 @@ static void owl_uart_config_port(struct uart_port *port, int flags)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL
> +
> +static int owl_uart_poll_get_char(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + u32 c = NO_POLL_CHAR;
> +
> + if (!(owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_RFEM))
> + c = owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_RXDAT);
> +
> + return c;
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_uart_poll_put_char(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char c)
> +{
> + /* Wait while TX FIFO is full */
> + while (owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_TFFU)
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + /* Send the character out */
> + owl_uart_write(port, c, OWL_UART_TXDAT);
> +
> + /* Wait for transmitter to become empty */
> + while (owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_TRFL_MASK)
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
How is this different from earlycon? I dislike that this is being
open-coded. Please try to reuse existing functions for this.
Regards,
Andreas
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL */
> +
> static const struct uart_ops owl_uart_ops = {
> .set_mctrl = owl_uart_set_mctrl,
> .get_mctrl = owl_uart_get_mctrl,
> @@ -476,6 +505,10 @@ static const struct uart_ops owl_uart_ops = {
> .request_port = owl_uart_request_port,
> .release_port = owl_uart_release_port,
> .verify_port = owl_uart_verify_port,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL
> + .poll_get_char = owl_uart_poll_get_char,
> + .poll_put_char = owl_uart_poll_put_char,
> +#endif
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_OWL_CONSOLE
>
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 15:50 [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: owl: Add support for kernel debugger Cristian Ciocaltea
2020-05-29 15:56 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2020-05-29 17:10 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16ff435f-9172-e01d-dfe6-7aa8575c4bd6@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox