public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: owl: Add support for kernel debugger
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:56:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16ff435f-9172-e01d-dfe6-7aa8575c4bd6@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ee88060c129715980592a1ae33c93923916a14b.1590766726.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>

Hi,

Am 29.05.20 um 17:50 schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea:
> Implement poll_put_char and poll_get_char callbacks in struct uart_ops
> that enables OWL UART to be used for KGDB debugging over serial line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> index c2fa2f15d50a..26dcc374dec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/owl-uart.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>   #include <linux/console.h>
>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>   #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -20,13 +21,13 @@
>   #include <linux/tty.h>
>   #include <linux/tty_flip.h>
>   
> -#define OWL_UART_PORT_NUM 7
> -#define OWL_UART_DEV_NAME "ttyOWL"
> +#define OWL_UART_PORT_NUM		7
> +#define OWL_UART_DEV_NAME		"ttyOWL"
>   
> -#define OWL_UART_CTL	0x000
> -#define OWL_UART_RXDAT	0x004
> -#define OWL_UART_TXDAT	0x008
> -#define OWL_UART_STAT	0x00c
> +#define OWL_UART_CTL			0x000
> +#define OWL_UART_RXDAT			0x004
> +#define OWL_UART_TXDAT			0x008
> +#define OWL_UART_STAT			0x00c

Please do not unnecessarily re-indent kernel code. You can do so when 
you're actually adding something new.

>   
>   #define OWL_UART_CTL_DWLS_MASK		GENMASK(1, 0)
>   #define OWL_UART_CTL_DWLS_5BITS		(0x0 << 0)
> @@ -461,6 +462,34 @@ static void owl_uart_config_port(struct uart_port *port, int flags)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL
> +
> +static int owl_uart_poll_get_char(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> +	u32 c = NO_POLL_CHAR;
> +
> +	if (!(owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_RFEM))
> +		c = owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_RXDAT);
> +
> +	return c;
> +}
> +
> +static void owl_uart_poll_put_char(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char c)
> +{
> +	/* Wait while TX FIFO is full */
> +	while (owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_TFFU)
> +		cpu_relax();
> +
> +	/* Send the character out */
> +	owl_uart_write(port, c, OWL_UART_TXDAT);
> +
> +	/* Wait for transmitter to become empty */
> +	while (owl_uart_read(port, OWL_UART_STAT) & OWL_UART_STAT_TRFL_MASK)
> +		cpu_relax();
> +}

How is this different from earlycon? I dislike that this is being 
open-coded. Please try to reuse existing functions for this.

Regards,
Andreas

> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL */
> +
>   static const struct uart_ops owl_uart_ops = {
>   	.set_mctrl = owl_uart_set_mctrl,
>   	.get_mctrl = owl_uart_get_mctrl,
> @@ -476,6 +505,10 @@ static const struct uart_ops owl_uart_ops = {
>   	.request_port = owl_uart_request_port,
>   	.release_port = owl_uart_release_port,
>   	.verify_port = owl_uart_verify_port,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CONSOLE_POLL
> +	.poll_get_char	= owl_uart_poll_get_char,
> +	.poll_put_char	= owl_uart_poll_put_char,
> +#endif
>   };
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_OWL_CONSOLE
> 


-- 
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-29 15:50 [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: owl: Add support for kernel debugger Cristian Ciocaltea
2020-05-29 15:56 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2020-05-29 17:10   ` Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16ff435f-9172-e01d-dfe6-7aa8575c4bd6@suse.de \
    --to=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox