From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com>
Cc: sgoutham@marvell.com, gakula@marvell.com, sbhatta@marvell.com,
hkelam@marvell.com, lcherian@marvell.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
wojciech.drewek@intel.com
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:00:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170074082435.27332.7452962954462258378.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121165624.3664182-1-sumang@marvell.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 22:26:24 +0530 you wrote:
> It is possible to add a ntuple rule which would like to direct packet to
> a VF whose number of queues are greater/less than its PF's queue numbers.
> For example a PF can have 2 Rx queues but a VF created on that PF can have
> 8 Rx queues. As of today, ntuple rule will reject rule because it is
> checking the requested queue number against PF's number of Rx queues.
> As a part of this fix if the action of a ntuple rule is to move a packet
> to a VF's queue then the check is removed. Also, a debug information is
> printed to aware user that it is user's responsibility to cross check if
> the requested queue number on that VF is a valid one.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4aa1d8f89b10
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 16:56 [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF Suman Ghosh
2023-11-22 9:11 ` Wojciech Drewek
2023-11-23 9:46 ` Simon Horman
2023-11-23 12:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170074082435.27332.7452962954462258378.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=sumang@marvell.com \
--cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox