public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, lkp@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net, quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com,
	mwalle@kernel.org, max.schulze@online.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netlink: Return unsigned value for nla_len()
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 19:40:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170206442406.2842.16381176213819730158.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231206205904.make.018-kees@kernel.org>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Wed,  6 Dec 2023 12:59:07 -0800 you wrote:
> The return value from nla_len() is never expected to be negative, and can
> never be more than struct nlattr::nla_len (a u16). Adjust the prototype
> on the function. This will let GCC's value range optimization passes
> know that the return can never be negative, and can never be larger than
> u16. As recently discussed[1], this silences the following warning in
> GCC 12+:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] netlink: Return unsigned value for nla_len()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/172db56d90d2

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-08 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-06 20:59 [PATCH v3] netlink: Return unsigned value for nla_len() Kees Cook
2023-12-08 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2023-12-11  9:39 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170206442406.2842.16381176213819730158.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=max.schulze@online.de \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox