From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030468AbWHXTpd (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:45:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030470AbWHXTpc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:45:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42909 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030468AbWHXTpc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:45:32 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1156447974.5629.54.camel@localhost> References: <1156447974.5629.54.camel@localhost> <1156432859.5629.24.camel@localhost> <32511.1156263593@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <7346.1156444521@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Trond Myklebust Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, aviro@redhat.com, steved@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Check lengths more thoroughly in NFS4 readdir XDR decode X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:45:08 +0100 Message-ID: <17073.1156448708@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Trond Myklebust wrote: > No. I find that mixture of < and <= is much less easy to read. Besides, > the compiler should be able to optimise that for me. So you don't think they're mathematically equivalent? David