From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
fan.yu9@zte.com.cn, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn, si.hao@zte.com.cn,
zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn, he.peilin@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv6: Fix route deleting failure when metric equals 0
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 02:40:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171591363070.2697.1355959441685915624.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240514201102055dD2Ba45qKbLlUMxu_DTHP@zte.com.cn>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 14 May 2024 20:11:02 +0800 (CST) you wrote:
> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
>
> Problem
> =========
> After commit 67f695134703 ("ipv6: Move setting default metric for routes"),
> we noticed that the logic of assigning the default value of fc_metirc
> changed in the ioctl process. That is, when users use ioctl(fd, SIOCADDRT,
> rt) with a non-zero metric to add a route, then they may fail to delete a
> route with passing in a metric value of 0 to the kernel by ioctl(fd,
> SIOCDELRT, rt). But iproute can succeed in deleting it.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- net/ipv6: Fix route deleting failure when metric equals 0
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/bb487272380d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-14 12:11 [PATCH] net/ipv6: Fix route deleting failure when metric equals 0 xu.xin16
2024-05-14 15:13 ` David Ahern
2024-05-17 2:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171591363070.2697.1355959441685915624.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fan.yu9@zte.com.cn \
--cc=he.peilin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=si.hao@zte.com.cn \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
--cc=yang.yang29@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox