From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selinux: simple cleanup for cond_read_node()
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:36:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1719649.5PAcuqR8Pm@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402762742-2808-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 01:19:01 AM Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The node->cur_state and len can be read in a single call of next_entry().
> And setting len before reading is a dead write so can be eliminated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> security/selinux/ss/conditional.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c index 377d148e7157..4766a38fae9a 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
> @@ -402,19 +402,14 @@ static int cond_read_node(struct policydb *p, struct
> cond_node *node, void *fp) int rc;
> struct cond_expr *expr = NULL, *last = NULL;
>
> - rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32));
> + rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(buf));
This is a bit nit-picky, but how about using "sizeof(u32) * 2"? It is more
consistent with the rest of the function and helps underscore that we are
reading two 32-bit values.
Assuming you're okay with the change I can fix it up when I apply the patch.
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> node->cur_state = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
>
> - len = 0;
> - rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32));
> - if (rc)
> - return rc;
> -
> /* expr */
> - len = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> + len = le32_to_cpu(buf[1]);
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32) * 2);
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-14 16:19 [PATCH 1/2] selinux: simple cleanup for cond_read_node() Namhyung Kim
2014-06-14 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] selinux: fix a possible memory leak in cond_read_node() Namhyung Kim
2014-06-18 19:41 ` Paul Moore
2014-06-18 19:36 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2014-06-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] selinux: simple cleanup for cond_read_node() Namhyung Kim
2014-06-19 18:59 ` Paul Moore
2014-06-19 12:03 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1719649.5PAcuqR8Pm@sifl \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox