From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:28 -0400 Received: from roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com ([24.169.102.121]:29959 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:43:01 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Matthias Andree , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 Message-ID: <172380000.989592181@tiny> In-Reply-To: <20010511013913.D31966@emma1.emma.line.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, May 11, 2001 01:39:13 AM +0200 Matthias Andree wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2001, Hans Reiser wrote: > >> > Hmm... Reiserfs is incompatible with knfsd? That might explain the >> >> we have a patch on our website. > > I'm always wondering why the patch hasn't been merged. Is it so > dangerous to apply in that it might distract other pieces of the system? > Has anyone reported increased problems after applying the patch? It requires explicit changes to each filesystem that wants to work over NFS, and is a somewhat large change. -chris