From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1AB2391A1; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733395817; cv=none; b=SEX2Fus/CwBfn2ZdKWFa31cP+6tP8Meycah7AKjXKGPKAihyDPJBieFEDg702B/C6c2aJW4D6kw5aftD26srCcxBcRWcXO1+5PAsmmj/P6aYfCalnJPiNBreKXUsNqad9VCGPJs2/BPJtincbLhd7oNj5GeMLPJ8eAI594q6tDM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733395817; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hC/g/ej9iegvPjoYKMnZE1MKWG6g0oMR4/9cGEHr8+8=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=a9QWVhQCrqksY6AEFANYBwwgujHsDlGeM4QNhy08AU8mIKXg+HRdaUHaCCOuv0wSY5gCh1NaYyexEaTy8NmBzdFBG4Y3HmJ1MpU9WpB1qrpb1FGZTFGYnvDnyHXSgdsJVgghzGruiGhVrcyf3cZJDswcERhy540uOtYL1mugvoc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TaSHIPDf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TaSHIPDf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1A18C4CED1; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:50:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733395816; bh=hC/g/ej9iegvPjoYKMnZE1MKWG6g0oMR4/9cGEHr8+8=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=TaSHIPDf9qVi7iNe6O0AMe2/c1FiuAPQtxgmI2jrOSLEuaxK7MgpUm8HNGVXxQuir rkzCoR7JAsEDPO+ocgyndm4W187ANUqgwseVV1lUsYAmO5p9bh7WYYffcMtPTDdNxw bEmuQnqo1i9YKR223WYgy2vKHNMByeCBldOTrCmMVDVPuUWHqQIPNJCpasnfxpokzf 5WT7PDOh7rBGgHRG7qfKGZD/P5Vw2ohsoljSl+jTrsWn3mBcVNhUCT/8QBg4bfhhYH 0sFnzgUMepiWzxA3Ls86NHaAjfDBzfBPhnpNNNFzd45PN2Z0buaSxzV85ST6VaSOZq IS3WFKACkHfOA== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4F4380A94D; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net v8 0/3] vsock/test: fix wrong setsockopt() parameters From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <173339583150.1545533.78880242047414570.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 10:50:31 +0000 References: <20241203150656.287028-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20241203150656.287028-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> To: Konstantin Shkolnyy Cc: sgarzare@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pabeni@redhat.com, AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru, mst@redhat.com Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Paolo Abeni : On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:06:53 -0600 you wrote: > Parameters were created using wrong C types, which caused them to be of > wrong size on some architectures, causing problems. > > The problem with SO_RCVLOWAT was found on s390 (big endian), while x86-64 > didn't show it. After the fix, all tests pass on s390. > Then Stefano Garzarella pointed out that SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls might have > a similar problem, which turned out to be true, hence, the second patch. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,v8,1/3] vsock/test: fix failures due to wrong SO_RCVLOWAT parameter https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7ce1c0921a80 - [net,v8,2/3] vsock/test: fix parameter types in SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/3f36ee29e732 - [net,v8,3/3] vsock/test: verify socket options after setting them https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/86814d8ffd55 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html