* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-12-23 21:15 ` SeongJae Park
2024-12-23 22:41 ` Shuah Khan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-12-23 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: SeongJae Park, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, damon
Hello,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:57:50 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/damonitor/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 6a86252ba24f ("Linux 6.6.68-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh # SKIP
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh # SKIP
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-23 21:15 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-12-23 22:41 ` Shuah Khan
2024-12-24 6:46 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-12-23 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 12/23/24 08:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.68-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-23 21:15 ` SeongJae Park
2024-12-23 22:41 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-12-24 6:46 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-12-24 10:22 ` Ron Economos
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-12-24 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Vegard Nossum
Hi Greg,
On 23/12/24 21:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-24 6:46 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-12-24 10:22 ` Ron Economos
2024-12-24 11:03 ` Peter Schneider
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-12-24 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/23/24 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.68-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-24 10:22 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-12-24 11:03 ` Peter Schneider
2024-12-24 13:26 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2024-12-24 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 23.12.2024 um 16:57 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Happy holiday season!
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-24 11:03 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2024-12-24 13:26 ` Jon Hunter
2024-12-24 19:38 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-12-24 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:57:50 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.68-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.6:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.6.68-rc1-g6a86252ba24f
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-24 13:26 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-12-24 19:38 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-12-26 10:12 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-12-24 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 at 21:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.68-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.68-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 6a86252ba24f89c8deb21b44cb5ffc867d9ab96f
* git describe: v6.6.67-117-g6a86252ba24f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.67-117-g6a86252ba24f
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.66-110-g584b6d5f2ac7)
## Test result summary
total: 158707, pass: 130517, fail: 3971, skip: 24142, xfail: 77
## Build Summary
* arc: 6 total, 5 passed, 1 failed
* arm: 132 total, 132 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 42 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 31 total, 28 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 30 total, 25 passed, 5 failed
* parisc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 32 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 23 total, 22 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 18 total, 14 passed, 4 failed
* sh: 12 total, 10 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 8 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 36 total, 35 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-sm[
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-24 19:38 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-12-26 10:12 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-12-26 17:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-26 19:28 ` [PATCH 6.6] " Hardik Garg
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum @ 2024-12-26 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: Usama.Anjum, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/23/24 8:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.68-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
OVERVIEW
Builds: 42 passed, 0 failed
Boot tests: 528 passed, 0 failed
CI systems: broonie, maestro
REVISION
Commit
name: v6.6.67-117-g6a86252ba24f
hash: 6a86252ba24f89c8deb21b44cb5ffc867d9ab96f
Checked out from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
BUILDS
No build failures found
BOOT TESTS
No boot failure found
See complete and up-to-date report at:
https://kcidb.kernelci.org/d/revision/revision?orgId=1&var-git_commit_hash=6a86252ba24f89c8deb21b44cb5ffc867d9ab96f&var-patchset_hash=
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
KernelCI team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-26 10:12 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
@ 2024-12-26 17:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-26 19:28 ` [PATCH 6.6] " Hardik Garg
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-12-26 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/23/2024 7:57 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.68 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:53:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.68-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6] 6.6.68-rc1 review
2024-12-23 15:57 [PATCH 6.6 000/116] 6.6.68-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-26 17:04 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-12-26 19:28 ` Hardik Garg
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2024-12-26 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, amd kselftest tool builds fine for v6.6.68-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread