From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757660Ab2BIKBp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:01:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5416 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752470Ab2BIKBm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:01:42 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <22934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <22934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20120208122905.8902.65762.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, jmorris@namei.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable" Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:13 +0000 Message-ID: <17357.1328781673@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)? Just > checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the > collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;) Ummm... Odd... I'm surprised StGIT managed to reapply my patches with no warning. I'll fix the numbering in them. David