From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
To: Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
lihangjing@bytedance.com, xieyongji@bytedance.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] riscv: mm: Fix the out of bound issue of vmemmap address
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 16:16:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173643940874.1375203.8254463448578997209.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103092023.37083-1-luxu.kernel@bytedance.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 17:20:23 +0800 you wrote:
> In sparse vmemmap model, the virtual address of vmemmap is calculated as:
> ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - (phys_ram_base >> PAGE_SHIFT)).
> And the struct page's va can be calculated with an offset:
> (vmemmap + (pfn)).
>
> However, when initializing struct pages, kernel actually starts from the
> first page from the same section that phys_ram_base belongs to. If the
> first page's physical address is not (phys_ram_base >> PAGE_SHIFT), then
> we get an va below VMEMMAP_START when calculating va for it's struct page.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [RESEND,v4] riscv: mm: Fix the out of bound issue of vmemmap address
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/f754f27e98f8
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-03 9:20 [PATCH RESEND v4] riscv: mm: Fix the out of bound issue of vmemmap address Xu Lu
2025-01-09 16:16 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173643940874.1375203.8254463448578997209.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=lihangjing@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luxu.kernel@bytedance.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox