From: "tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/bugs: Fix RSB clearing in indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 11:44:24 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174419906465.31282.1403799089359507668.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bba68888c511743d4cd65564d1fc41438907523f.1744148254.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: b1b19cfcf4656c75088dc06b7499f493e0dec3e5
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/b1b19cfcf4656c75088dc06b7499f493e0dec3e5
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 14:47:32 -07:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 12:41:30 +02:00
x86/bugs: Fix RSB clearing in indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
IBPB is expected to clear the RSB. However, if X86_BUG_IBPB_NO_RET is
set, that doesn't happen. Make indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
take that into account by calling write_ibpb() which clears RSB on
X86_BUG_IBPB_NO_RET:
/* Make sure IBPB clears return stack preductions too. */
FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %rax, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_BUG_IBPB_NO_RET
Note that, as of the previous patch, write_ibpb() also reads
'x86_pred_cmd' in order to use SBPB when applicable:
movl _ASM_RIP(x86_pred_cmd), %eax
Therefore that existing behavior in indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
is not lost.
Fixes: 50e4b3b94090 ("x86/entry: Have entry_ibpb() invalidate return predictions")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bba68888c511743d4cd65564d1fc41438907523f.1744148254.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index 591d1db..5c43f14 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -514,11 +514,11 @@ void alternative_msr_write(unsigned int msr, u64 val, unsigned int feature)
: "memory");
}
-extern u64 x86_pred_cmd;
-
static inline void indirect_branch_prediction_barrier(void)
{
- alternative_msr_write(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, x86_pred_cmd, X86_FEATURE_IBPB);
+ asm_inline volatile(ALTERNATIVE("", "call write_ibpb", X86_FEATURE_IBPB)
+ : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT
+ :: "rax", "rcx", "rdx", "memory");
}
/* The Intel SPEC CTRL MSR base value cache */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 608bbe6..9926509 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, x86_spec_ctrl_current);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_spec_ctrl_current);
u64 x86_pred_cmd __ro_after_init = PRED_CMD_IBPB;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_pred_cmd);
static u64 __ro_after_init x86_arch_cap_msr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 21:47 [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/bugs: RSB mitigation fixes and documentation Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 21:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/bugs: Rename entry_ibpb() to write_ibpb() Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-09 11:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 21:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/bugs: Use SBPB in write_ibpb() if applicable Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-09 11:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 21:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86/bugs: Fix RSB clearing in indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-09 11:44 ` tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2025-04-08 21:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on VMEXIT with eIBRS+retpoline Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-09 11:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 21:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on context switch with eIBRS Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-09 11:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 21:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/bugs: Add RSB mitigation document Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-09 11:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174419906465.31282.1403799089359507668.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).