Re: [PATCH v2 00/57] irqdomain: Cleanups and Documentation

Jiri Slaby
2025-05-12T09:56:19Z

On 06. 05. 25, 15:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19 2025 at 10:28, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the
>> respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that
>> the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts
>> during merges.
>
> So. It's rc5 by now and I picked up everything

Good, thanks.

> which did not show up in next yet.

Which is the majority -- routing through subsystems didn't work as well
as I anticipated.

I planned to retry with v3 after the next merge window, but you were faster.

V3 contains a switch from nodes to dev_fwnode() in some cases. It
simplifies the code there. This did not get lost, I will send this
separately to maintainers once everything from this series settles in
the tree. I.e. likely after the next merge window.

> @Jiri, I fixed up all your subject prefixes as
>
> 'irqdomain: subsys: Switch to foo()'
>
> does not make any sense at all. These subsystems have their regular
> prefixes and these changes do not justify made up irqdomain special
> prefixes at all.

Yes.

thanks,
--
js
suse labs