* [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq
@ 2025-05-08 13:44 Adrian Hunter
2025-05-09 17:01 ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-15 17:16 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Adrian Hunter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2025-05-08 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Shishkin, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, Ian Rogers, Kan Liang, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users
Currently, using PEBS-via-PT with a sample frequency instead of a sample
period, causes a segfault. For example:
[ 103.607823] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000195
[ 103.607876] <NMI>
[ 103.607879] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
[ 103.607885] ? page_fault_oops+0xca/0x290
[ 103.607891] ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x1b0
[ 103.607897] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
[ 103.607901] ? intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain+0x40/0x60
[ 103.607903] ? intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain+0x32/0x60
[ 103.607905] intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl+0x333/0x350
[ 103.607910] handle_pmi_common+0x272/0x3c0
[ 103.607919] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x10a/0x2e0
[ 103.607922] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2a/0x50
That happens because intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain() assumes all the
pebs_enabled bits represent counter indexes, which is not always the case.
In this particular case, bits 60 and 61 are set for PEBS-via-PT purposes.
The behaviour of PEBS-via-PT with sample frequency is questionable because
although a PMI is generated (PEBS_PMI_AFTER_EACH_RECORD), the period is not
adjusted anyway.
Putting that aside, fix intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain() by passing
the mask of counter bits instead of 'size'. Note, prior to the Fixes
commit, 'size' would be limited to the maximum counter index, so the issue
was not hit.
Fixes: 722e42e45c2f1 ("perf/x86: Support counter mask")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index adb2e44761b2..8da1105a419f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2469,8 +2469,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_
setup_pebs_fixed_sample_data);
}
-static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int size)
+static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, u64 mask)
{
+ u64 pebs_enabled = cpuc->pebs_enabled & mask;
struct perf_event *event;
int bit;
@@ -2481,7 +2482,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int
* It needs to call intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload() to
* update the event->count for this case.
*/
- for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&cpuc->pebs_enabled, size) {
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&pebs_enabled, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
event = cpuc->events[bit];
if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 0);
@@ -2516,7 +2517,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
}
if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
- intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, size);
+ intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
return;
}
@@ -2630,7 +2631,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
(hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask64) << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED);
if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
- intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
+ intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
return;
}
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq
2025-05-08 13:44 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq Adrian Hunter
@ 2025-05-09 17:01 ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-15 17:16 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Adrian Hunter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2025-05-09 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Hunter, Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Shishkin, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, Ian Rogers, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users
On 2025-05-08 9:44 a.m., Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Currently, using PEBS-via-PT with a sample frequency instead of a sample
> period, causes a segfault. For example:
>
> [ 103.607823] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000195
> [ 103.607876] <NMI>
> [ 103.607879] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
> [ 103.607885] ? page_fault_oops+0xca/0x290
> [ 103.607891] ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x1b0
> [ 103.607897] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
> [ 103.607901] ? intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain+0x40/0x60
> [ 103.607903] ? intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain+0x32/0x60
> [ 103.607905] intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl+0x333/0x350
> [ 103.607910] handle_pmi_common+0x272/0x3c0
> [ 103.607919] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x10a/0x2e0
> [ 103.607922] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2a/0x50
>
> That happens because intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain() assumes all the
> pebs_enabled bits represent counter indexes, which is not always the case.
> In this particular case, bits 60 and 61 are set for PEBS-via-PT purposes.
>
> The behaviour of PEBS-via-PT with sample frequency is questionable because
> although a PMI is generated (PEBS_PMI_AFTER_EACH_RECORD), the period is not
> adjusted anyway.
>
> Putting that aside, fix intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain() by passing
> the mask of counter bits instead of 'size'. Note, prior to the Fixes
> commit, 'size' would be limited to the maximum counter index, so the issue
> was not hit.
>
> Fixes: 722e42e45c2f1 ("perf/x86: Support counter mask")
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Thanks for the fix.
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> index adb2e44761b2..8da1105a419f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -2469,8 +2469,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_
> setup_pebs_fixed_sample_data);
> }
>
> -static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int size)
> +static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, u64 mask)
> {
> + u64 pebs_enabled = cpuc->pebs_enabled & mask;
> struct perf_event *event;
> int bit;
>
> @@ -2481,7 +2482,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int
> * It needs to call intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload() to
> * update the event->count for this case.
> */
> - for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&cpuc->pebs_enabled, size) {
> + for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&pebs_enabled, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> event = cpuc->events[bit];
> if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
> intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 0);
> @@ -2516,7 +2517,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
> }
>
> if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
> - intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, size);
> + intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2630,7 +2631,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
> (hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask64) << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED);
>
> if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
> - intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
> + intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
> return;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [tip: perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq
2025-05-08 13:44 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq Adrian Hunter
2025-05-09 17:01 ` Liang, Kan
@ 2025-05-15 17:16 ` tip-bot2 for Adrian Hunter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Adrian Hunter @ 2025-05-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Adrian Hunter, Ingo Molnar, Kan Liang, Peter Zijlstra,
Ingo Molnar, Alexander Shishkin, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, Ian Rogers, linux-perf-users, x86,
linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 99bcd91fabada0dbb1d5f0de44532d8008db93c6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/99bcd91fabada0dbb1d5f0de44532d8008db93c6
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 08 May 2025 16:44:52 +03:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:15:54 +02:00
perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq
Currently, using PEBS-via-PT with a sample frequency instead of a sample
period, causes a segfault. For example:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000195
<NMI>
? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
? page_fault_oops+0xca/0x290
? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x1b0
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
? intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain+0x40/0x60
? intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain+0x32/0x60
intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl+0x333/0x350
handle_pmi_common+0x272/0x3c0
intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x10a/0x2e0
perf_event_nmi_handler+0x2a/0x50
That happens because intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain() assumes all the
pebs_enabled bits represent counter indexes, which is not always the case.
In this particular case, bits 60 and 61 are set for PEBS-via-PT purposes.
The behaviour of PEBS-via-PT with sample frequency is questionable because
although a PMI is generated (PEBS_PMI_AFTER_EACH_RECORD), the period is not
adjusted anyway.
Putting that aside, fix intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain() by passing
the mask of counter bits instead of 'size'. Note, prior to the Fixes
commit, 'size' would be limited to the maximum counter index, so the issue
was not hit.
Fixes: 722e42e45c2f1 ("perf/x86: Support counter mask")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250508134452.73960-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com
---
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 9b20acc..8d86e91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2465,8 +2465,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_
setup_pebs_fixed_sample_data);
}
-static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int size)
+static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, u64 mask)
{
+ u64 pebs_enabled = cpuc->pebs_enabled & mask;
struct perf_event *event;
int bit;
@@ -2477,7 +2478,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int
* It needs to call intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload() to
* update the event->count for this case.
*/
- for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&cpuc->pebs_enabled, size) {
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&pebs_enabled, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
event = cpuc->events[bit];
if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 0);
@@ -2512,7 +2513,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
}
if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
- intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, size);
+ intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
return;
}
@@ -2626,7 +2627,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl(struct pt_regs *iregs, struct perf_sample_d
(hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask64) << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED);
if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
- intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
+ intel_pmu_pebs_event_update_no_drain(cpuc, mask);
return;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-15 17:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-08 13:44 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Fix segfault with PEBS-via-PT with sample_freq Adrian Hunter
2025-05-09 17:01 ` Liang, Kan
2025-05-15 17:16 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Adrian Hunter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).