From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB8FC004D4 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 17:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229971AbjASRVq (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:21:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33292 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230177AbjASRVi (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:21:38 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDAD903A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip5b412258.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.65.34.88] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1pIYbR-0005F1-HO; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:21:29 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Andrew Jones , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jisheng Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: alternative: proceed one more instruction for auipc/jalr pair Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:21:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1748643.VLH7GnMWUR@diego> In-Reply-To: <20230115162811.3146-1-jszhang@kernel.org> References: <20230115162811.3146-1-jszhang@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2023, 17:28:11 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang: > If we patched auipc + jalr pair, we'd better proceed one more > instruction. Andrew pointed out "There's not a problem now, since > we're only adding a fixup for jal, not jalr, but we should > future-proof this and there's no reason to revisit an already fixed-up > instruction anyway." > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner