From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C105B241670; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749572879; cv=none; b=ITlcXgVfOlBb31ajHkRt8EVhEL1GNWw87M4NUgrlfedPlFF8huPhWvw2EG3Vt8g4cVEk4f6Q8VQNzjjMPNwPJVj/7SUCeAwogRZ7HxV8F+srFT0ad7rNKTQ+s/sPw5Aayxz4hMnjvtcBU3HLQ5ljR4yTrqA5m7CWMqmJajhibvc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749572879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M7AR7P2Hp2v576w27gcBYA1QJAA51vBNSHPVxtZiM1s=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=uyDe03wHJ1zGz97nMCwPFNsCGjD5WNFzTqC3nUSsiZ/zHY+D2TYzUSCAsUdLyNvTeiQk639Lld8WNyh46WhN0qaTqyQYmokC+lTE73v46jeGx9shlpuAYHTvVGNIFokQzVhOSz6RE5LZh+eacwa7EN9vOeEwwG85iALF6jZR4TI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KFMK9Qrg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KFMK9Qrg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40E8CC4CEED; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:27:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749572879; bh=M7AR7P2Hp2v576w27gcBYA1QJAA51vBNSHPVxtZiM1s=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=KFMK9QrgISSTDvxGudz6a85hexiOz9fN02iUkdTutBUXfp7ygyrWlMCX3ccpZPK2W KyPJaujZxGXU/fxxfBo/GpgldljWm/oRCN+O6S47EHw+r0x70PqoUq9KAHaNbp2vgH QQoBfMnMCwXLwDBYn3M1n3up7KpBSFu/QvhRU5FRX/3xQbnu3H7cvecri1C+npthOt Su3nbFFwtWfwq+nxld3jUukygNRn8ezdtekIXeYAIcMcqDdHn8gI8LwuRS0QLfghMo 5vSD15iZiyo1+4z9QrEtDAAgTvZ8fD8H+kyKRr0AKuKh+U5M+miqArQa7nYKoSpz6g +BSqSPYz8Jykg== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADC139D6540; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: lockdep improvements From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org Message-Id: <174957290974.2454024.11071746229021073521.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:28:29 +0000 References: <20250512180407.659015-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250512180407.659015-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, jingzhangos@google.com, hpa@zytor.com, sebott@redhat.com, lishusen2@huawei.com, longman@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bhelgaas@google.com, bp@alien8.de, anup@brainfault.org, will@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, glider@google.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr, yuzenghui@huawei.com, peterz@infradead.org, atishp@atishpatra.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, x86@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, jiangkunkun@huawei.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, alex@ghiti.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu Hello: This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) by Paolo Bonzini : On Mon, 12 May 2025 14:04:01 -0400 you wrote: > This is a continuation of my 'extract lock_all_vcpus/unlock_all_vcpus' > patch series. > > Implement the suggestion of using lockdep's "nest_lock" feature > when locking all KVM vCPUs by adding mutex_trylock_nest_lock() and > mutex_lock_killable_nest_lock() and use these functions in the > implementation of the > kvm_trylock_all_vcpus()/kvm_lock_all_vcpus()/kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(). > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v5,1/6] locking/mutex: implement mutex_trylock_nested https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c5b6ababd21a - [v5,2/6] locking/mutex: implement mutex_lock_killable_nest_lock https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/fb49f07ba1d9 - [v5,3/6] KVM: add kvm_lock_all_vcpus and kvm_trylock_all_vcpus https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/e4a454ced74c - [v5,4/6] x86: KVM: SVM: use kvm_lock_all_vcpus instead of a custom implementation https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c560bc9286e6 - [v5,5/6] KVM: arm64: use kvm_trylock_all_vcpus when locking all vCPUs https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/b586c5d21954 - [v5,6/6] RISC-V: KVM: use kvm_trylock_all_vcpus when locking all vCPUs https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/8f56770d114b You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html