Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc

Kumar Gala
2006-04-05T01:23:51Z

On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:14:04 -0500 (CDT) Kumar Gala
> <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of
>> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
>>
>> to receive the following updates:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_cds_defconfig | 846 ++++++++++++++++
>> +++++++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c | 1
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig | 9
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Makefile | 1
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds.c | 359 ++++++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_cds.h | 43 +
>> arch/ppc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c | 1
>> include/asm-ppc/mpc85xx.h | 3
>> 8 files changed, 1262 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Andy Fleming:
>> Add 85xx CDS to arch/powerpc
>
> Could these "add xxx to arch/powerpc" patches please move any relevant
> headers files to include/asm-powerpc as well. It would be nice if we
> could remove the hack from the powerpc Makefile that include files
> from
> include/asm-ppc. i.e. My opinion is that if any ARCH=powerpc build
> requires a file in include/asm-ppc, then that file should be moved to
> include/asm-powerpc. I am doing a set of patches to that effect.

We need the irq rework before I'd be willing to do this. The main
dependancy between asm-ppc and asm-powerpc is the static IRQs we
currently have. I'd rather spend time on fixing up the IRQ handling
to parse the flat dev tree.

- kumar