public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/22] Replace the CFQ I/O Scheduler with BFQ
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 17:56:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17539224.xnQ9OR2lcz@amdc1976> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZjMcOyn6C-xV3yLsQM0hxZ1JUMGmmS8VqaDpx1xiL1ZA@mail.gmail.com>


Hi,

On Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:39:46 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> >  - Do some benchmarks on the current status of the various branches on
> >    relevant hardware (including trying to convert some of these slower
> >    devices to blk-mq and seeing what happens).  Linus has been working
> >    on this already in the context of MMC.
> 
> I'm trying to do a patch switching MMC to use blk-mq, so I can
> benchmark performance before/after this.
> 
> While we expect mq to perform worse on single-hardware-queue
> devices like these, we don't know until we tried, so I'm trying.

I did this (switched MMC to blk-mq) some time ago.  Patches are
extremely ugly and hacky (basically the whole MMC block layer
glue code needs to be re-done) so I'm rather reluctant to
sharing them yet (to be honest I would like to rewrite them
completely before posting).

I only did linear read tests (using dd) so far and results that
I got were mixed (BTW the hardware I'm doing this work on is
Odroid-XU3).  Pure block performance under maximum CPU frequency
was slightly worse (5-12%) but the CPU consumption was reduced so
when CPU was scaled down manually (or ondemand CPUfreq governor
was used) blk-mq mode results were better then vanilla ones (up
to 10% when CPU was scaled down to minimum frequency and even
up to 50% when using ondemand governor - this finding is very
interesting and needs to be investigated further).

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-05 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-08 11:14 [PATCH V2 00/22] Replace the CFQ I/O Scheduler with BFQ Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:14 ` [PATCH V2 01/22] block, cfq: remove queue merging for close cooperators Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:14 ` [PATCH V2 02/22] block, cfq: remove close-based preemption Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:14 ` [PATCH V2 03/22] block, cfq: remove deep seek queues logic Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:14 ` [PATCH V2 04/22] block, cfq: remove SSD-related logic Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 05/22] block, cfq: get rid of hierarchical support Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 06/22] block, cfq: get rid of queue preemption Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 07/22] block, cfq: get rid of workload type Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 08/22] block, cfq: get rid of latency tunables Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 10/22] block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 11/22] block, bfq: improve throughput boosting Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 12/22] block, bfq: modify the peak-rate estimator Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 13/22] block, bfq: add more fairness with writes and slow processes Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 14/22] block, bfq: improve responsiveness Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 15/22] block, bfq: reduce I/O latency for soft real-time applications Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 16/22] block, bfq: preserve a low latency also with NCQ-capable drives Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 17/22] block, bfq: reduce latency during request-pool saturation Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 18/22] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM) Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 19/22] block, bfq: reduce idling only in symmetric scenarios Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 20/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput on NCQ-capable flash-based devices Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 21/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput with random I/O on NCQ-capable HDDs Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 11:15 ` [PATCH V2 22/22] block, bfq: handle bursts of queue activations Paolo Valente
2016-08-08 13:19 ` [PATCH V2 00/22] Replace the CFQ I/O Scheduler with BFQ Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-08 13:37   ` Paolo
2016-08-31 22:09   ` Mark Brown
2016-09-01  8:39     ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-05 15:56       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2016-09-05 20:29         ` Paolo Valente
2016-09-08 11:51         ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-01 21:06     ` Eric Wheeler
2016-09-08 12:11       ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17539224.xnQ9OR2lcz@amdc1976 \
    --to=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox