From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 975CB27FD44; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761672630; cv=none; b=JZDDWN5ouLS7Dc3vPkGDrveGKKqbnPuFsd/Sv9cqkokWeva/d1oYIW+LNDFvNWkVIV7YM3FSTgP1Tgi8dabsEGhWb8eqeqFk94HAcE/3is1h7kxIjKkWJhUvXHqk3c9Ncf3ROcRPBfAaCkA+isRFjPfJe+Xamnk5OgWEyDubIY8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761672630; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vPNJqnSrDFmqPL/bM0GI9gC9avySOild+xvw4GcK7bs=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=Hxp9VseSAJ8Hbbbe9n5QaT65KFfd0ZNOkJQkXTLL6cA6bBMCEAK+cNJoImdhaBU75+dOMWP9zHjRQs9OWQzTsXPbfyUfLNWbC/iN68Y0pz6UVAUXe8eg7fFMqL+o2xfl1x1rPkEk8qB/hNbI0SPFCiy86yqWBDUqcaEgYmYWrDs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MjiuDSyJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MjiuDSyJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0823BC4CEE7; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761672630; bh=vPNJqnSrDFmqPL/bM0GI9gC9avySOild+xvw4GcK7bs=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=MjiuDSyJVhT+mA0Y8fsf4wpQ9OKzeEtyd/mOAJupNJr2ARlb3f8PlwY43YNANUTWW S81IHfdZgqySVjr8bRUZuRE+t5Ycr/CltDnci8Nq8cQxM2n7O+Adp7Pk+kFni48Cga wacr19MmF1wA3vzAW4LxKfIuBghyASaHoSQz/X+PJsY/9mlApPDor4/LX1L3ved9A2 xkSLFFjFQCl1qmdYAMhJo7CI3fytk+Q9/T/miMWjH+UaxP/dJ04Xy3bUdOwL605BNv vePjTiwwU5qQUdlWqc/7RAVOFeU+btauv0mPSkJeLuWlNysvJdAZtGHr07Cm1Wy8+W xxJxdKhxhktbw== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF1339EF942; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix the incorrect reference to the memlock_rlim variable in the comment. From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <176167260776.2322783.18424488316564504145.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:07 +0000 References: <20251027032008.738944-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20251027032008.738944-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com> To: Jianyun Gao Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko : On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:20:08 +0800 you wrote: > The variable "memlock_rlim_max" referenced in the comment does not exist. > I think that the author probably meant the variable "memlock_rlim". So, > correct it. > > Signed-off-by: Jianyun Gao > --- > tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Here is the summary with links: - libbpf: fix the incorrect reference to the memlock_rlim variable in the comment. https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/54c134f379ee You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html