From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C69B189F20; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764118244; cv=none; b=lEAK04PddEf60REQa8y6Jk5vX+iwCJ8YmPvP0RU3pQG/TSm6ju0QKcxOcVg5nTKbTMQlrmuN19qbaprDhBX2HOL+GRTwqs7YU9td29MmXS5tsh48VeFCYqZmYTMGUcI8llAht55P+AjXu4uTcfREffJPbw8wbAFfzn5gwM9HhIA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764118244; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IGG/k9VEnN2vUXPkStO/Qf5dnnQWnJmhlvvuRgu4Z/w=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=E9yxtxujrlv1Vji09t+aqc37dyh5COLsz37tJNnGZ7GSsGiv+8SypiDTVLbgmkocs0aSxux+zQz78FtOHpG3JNiSGsdrK7X1FbXWeV+mxdgZbIB6j73dbtcX84Mix6jTP4UxSH1u4brjvcuzLm/DDY5EQpD/I1x6HjpDDscC0Ms= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YIAQVN+E; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YIAQVN+E" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B747BC4CEF1; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:50:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764118243; bh=IGG/k9VEnN2vUXPkStO/Qf5dnnQWnJmhlvvuRgu4Z/w=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=YIAQVN+EOCCGCRHjs21hEALOQ3D1uJir4A2oUbmZpfYW4Cq2GxTgkk19QicohEzMm wXdzJ6U+zxF32COBa8X2PcJJvvS4vybc8QvuuaelHpPrYQWrxIuMLXyDieCuiSjlGm ATyYhw8hatylrIlHRkL4o2YRG/jRdgA7ALjfwkr4uLR/0zPTHmcgVcMmtvHfcLp+z6 4UrnFx4gQ4cUOhNwI9cUMkNAAs6ITpiotAVV/E2m29JTIvxb4wdZSkrtGR7GnZ0GiW 7Xfng+9o/zFcfMInUPapL9zwzhDJow7SRbX741EOcgUzX0HHZSWH9TFlWtTzTeiqoa 2CezF1qpnKfjw== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E0D380AAE9; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Fix validation logic in rate limiting From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <176411820601.971301.9105241183448628229.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:50:06 +0000 References: <20251124180043.2314428-1-dcostantino@meta.com> In-Reply-To: <20251124180043.2314428-1-dcostantino@meta.com> To: Danielle Costantino Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, gal@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, pabeni@redhat.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:00:43 -0800 you wrote: > The rate limiting validation condition currently checks the output > variable max_bw_value[i] instead of the input value > maxrate->tc_maxrate[i]. This causes the validation to compare an > uninitialized or stale value rather than the actual requested rate. > > The condition should check the input rate to properly validate against > the upper limit: > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net] net/mlx5e: Fix validation logic in rate limiting https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/d2099d9f16db You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html