From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0DF24DD09; Sun, 4 Jan 2026 05:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767506129; cv=none; b=agcs/GLALDZBJtVIYIf6Gh8l5WievQLyx+0wRNuJUiUheoYk20eZJpuhwmE59YosS5ajCate3foJaqXFol9MBUv5QZst3NwNIsBWUWttScs7aSQ5s2UqOagAUfp4LYms2TJNtZCWhk4HnEQZNAeA+SPTR1oEPj9ozoyZ/3Zh4u4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767506129; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bvcEYZX+JN8SQg3OfkTTKvOz8B84LEMdLKYmNZ5Vf/g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References; b=WH8OvTEe8gOKLa2eoZbaRg74vuomLyXvna7R3/OvSCjpYBDeGwleNMKzth4VFMq7WCTKKq002PK1jttz7VVlx7QriuN0F2xcj6NO4E4PTUqPOcQUip1GrBN5l3/7P9Fde9dBKYkh/5aclhxuxt7P4fYwiZ0FnfYWsDm4gPzdNIk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b=LCgKAjdk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="LCgKAjdk" Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1226) id 3B5C32125381; Sat, 3 Jan 2026 21:55:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 3B5C32125381 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1767506122; bh=D1lvfzzfDtjTq1iLATeqBIsx+b2iIWukWZbLU9J7P9A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LCgKAjdkKwl0BjuW8Gchv+ts0i+CZPhE6MstaFRoRqPNDmqlD9f3/UStYCZEke3qr 7Svx2pI3wqGmp3OeBMR+y/vhcfyOVFfMqWJrJc8f9CjTy1RarEegzOSl7zmJ+VwRUA awfzu8jbZfpMF5p7oWipiGwm4mcZv0mwYTWjMmzU= From: Hemanth Malla To: ihor.solodrai@linux.dev Cc: alan.maguire@oracle.com, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, daniel@iogearbox.net, dwarves@vger.kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org, vmalla@linux.microsoft.com, vmalla@microsoft.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, docs: Update pahole to 1.28 for selftests Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 21:55:22 -0800 Message-Id: <1767506122-8122-1-git-send-email-vmalla@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Ihor, > 1.28 is needed for --distilled_base [1], which is only a requirement > for tests using modules. Many other tests are likely to work with > older versions, but the minimum for the kernel build is 1.22 now [2]. > > Not sure if it's worth it to add this nuance to the QA doc, although > in general we should recommend people running the selftests to use the > latest pahole release. Maybe add a comment? Thanks for the references. Makes sense to include these in the docs. I'll send out a new patch. Thanks, Hemanth Malla