From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3.11][3.12][Regression] ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:23:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1770440.aHQcEYdRzT@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5014016.kNGQWXsIS0@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:16:05 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:00:50 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, November 15, 2013 11:55:10 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, November 15, 2013 12:44:11 PM Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > >
> > > > A kernel bug affecting several users was opened against Ubuntu[0].
> > > > After a bisect, it was found the following commit introduced the regression:
> > > >
> > > > commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc
> > > > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > > Date: Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200
> > > >
> > > > ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
> > > >
> > > > The regression was introduced as of v3.11-rc1.
> > > >
> > > > This commit doesn't revert cleanly in 3.12, and requires the revert of
> > > > other commits as well. I wanted to get your feedback since you are the
> > > > author.
> > >
> > > Well, that commit has nothing to do with PCMCIA, so I'm not sure how the
> > > breakage is related to it.
> > >
> > > Moreover, comment #8 reports 3.11.0-11.17 as working and the change you're
> > > asking about should be in that kernel as well.
> >
> > Ah, so that was bogus.
> >
> > Well, I'm still not sure how the commit in question may affect PCMCIA. I have
> > a test machine with PCMCIA and it boots correctly with 3.11+.
>
> The bisect could just trip over a different bug in that commit that was fixed
> later.
>
> Moreover, comment #70 indicates that 3.11.0-11-generic works correctly for
> someone.
>
> I'm also unsure what comment #43 means.
>
> And I wonder if the reported who "bisected" this can boot without PCMCIA?
One more thing. Comment #32 says that the reporter could not reproduce the
problem without "the -extras package which contains the PCMCIA drivers." So
I'm wondering why exactly the PCMCIA drivers are in that package?
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 17:44 [v3.11][3.12][Regression] ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure Joseph Salisbury
2013-11-15 22:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-15 23:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-15 23:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-15 23:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1770440.aHQcEYdRzT@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox