Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat

Andrea Arcangeli
2002-04-16T13:44:13Z

On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:30:16PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> under testing. Also, Andrew found a problem with your locking changes when
> he split up your patch, and at the time you were saying it is ready and
> there were no bug reports against in...

btw, it was a problem only for ext3.

> Does this patch conflict in any way with your vm patches? If not they
> should be able to co-exist.

it will generate rejects, but that's not the problem. My point is that
your same argument about merging in later kernels, stable kernel tree,
could be applied to patches that makes no difference to users too.

Andrea