Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat

Rik van Riel
2002-04-16T04:27:48Z

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:44:58AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:20:58PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > I won't scream too loud, but I think it's pretty much done right as is.
>
> Regardless if that's the cleaner implementation or not, I don't see much
> the point of merging those cleanups in 2.4 right now: it won't make any
> functional difference to users and it's only a self contained code
> cleanup, while other patches that make a runtime difference aren't
> merged yet.

Sorry to say it, but if you want patches to be merged, why
don't you submit them ?

regards,

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/