From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Mashiro Chen <mashiro.chen@mailbox.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: rose: reject truncated CLEAR_REQUEST frames in state machines
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 20:20:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <177602520954.3398432.9861431630028064654.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408172551.281486-1-mashiro.chen@mailbox.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 01:25:51 +0800 you wrote:
> All five ROSE state machines (states 1-5) handle ROSE_CLEAR_REQUEST
> by reading the cause and diagnostic bytes directly from skb->data[3]
> and skb->data[4] without verifying that the frame is long enough:
>
> rose_disconnect(sk, ..., skb->data[3], skb->data[4]);
>
> The entry-point check in rose_route_frame() only enforces
> ROSE_MIN_LEN (3 bytes), so a remote peer on a ROSE network can
> send a syntactically valid but truncated CLEAR_REQUEST (3 or 4
> bytes) while a connection is open in any state. Processing such a
> frame causes a one- or two-byte out-of-bounds read past the skb
> data, leaking uninitialized heap content as the cause/diagnostic
> values returned to user space via getsockopt(ROSE_GETCAUSE).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: rose: reject truncated CLEAR_REQUEST frames in state machines
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/2835750dd647
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-12 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 17:25 [PATCH net] net: rose: reject truncated CLEAR_REQUEST frames in state machines Mashiro Chen
2026-04-12 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=177602520954.3398432.9861431630028064654.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mashiro.chen@mailbox.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox