From: Martin Walch <walch.martin@web.de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: drop bogus default values
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:08:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178407860.0zoJnDfCo1@tacticalops> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426162307.5304.41.camel@x220>
On Thursday 12 March 2015 13:11:47 Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:59 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Default "no" is pretty pointless for options without (visible) prompts:
>
> Related: is there ever a situation where using "default n" or "def_bool
> n" makes sense (whether or not the entry has a prompt)? I think I once
> thought of one but I can't remember it at all, so I guess my memory is
> fooling me.
Your memory is right. It is rarely used, but there is an application for
using a plain "default n": to overwrite an existing other default value.
Particularly in one special case this is desired: Let us say there is a
symbol that may lack a visible prompt, but has the default value y set in
a Kconfig file that is used across all architectures. If there is a single
architecture that must have the default value n then it is possible to
override the default y in the global file with a default n in the
architecture specific file.
A real world case is PCI_QUIRKS in the mainline kernel:
init/Kconfig:1554: default y
arch/s390/Kconfig:59: def_bool n
When setting PCI!=n && EXPERT=n then on each architecture PCI_QUIRKS=y
except on s390 where PCI_QUIRKS=n.
Regards,
Martin Walch
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 13:59 [PATCH] Kconfig: drop bogus default values Jan Beulich
2015-03-12 12:11 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-12 12:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-12 12:41 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-12 18:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2015-03-23 21:08 ` Martin Walch [this message]
2015-03-23 21:24 ` Paul Bolle
2015-03-23 22:58 ` Martin Walch
2015-03-24 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-24 7:38 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178407860.0zoJnDfCo1@tacticalops \
--to=walch.martin@web.de \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox