From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBC3745D1B2; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784821246; cv=none; b=pw3itcM0nGNUFizV79tU/PMauTorZrdpcxYQRsO2w7EEiVsGtV0lpWeg/2//NS5DFIj9yDsUw0z7bs3LsHPCH/SSykst+ftuacC5TnWOSta4J3Au2tSFRrkvKjg3Q+eLsCp6yQ9oNZRYIbVmy8ATmiLQoSk306NBKLvILZABkYs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784821246; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gtToRZ7LCPow9Kyhulf+xB8no4IFdDA5XDCKAffU5dQ=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=Q35fMPN0pwWugNyECJK6vWnL/LKbfjJjirGWgcf2u2KaaQD5xUwfT5OiH4/JHfuU1dKcfQW2eQIbrPsymcc8zaLoFUxH5zQukRKw4sYs3TajhbE5DqMYbzd44IVCjVYBug1HBaFAzKZLXNwA80Mm84gjL7NRUuYsrSqeTrEPPV4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C16FC1F000E9; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9396B3924454; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] tcp: validate RST sequence in SYN-RECEIVED From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <178482121114.2324960.1921837977854405537.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:40:11 +0000 References: <20260717081443.809393-1-yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: <20260717081443.809393-1-yangyx22@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> To: Yuxiang Yang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, kuniyu@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, zhaoyz24@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn, wangao@seu.edu.cn, fengxw06@126.com, qli01@tsinghua.edu.cn, xuke@tsinghua.edu.cn, yyxroy22@gmail.com Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:14:41 +0000 you wrote: > The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path accepts any in-window RST and > removes the request, even when SEG.SEQ does not exactly match RCV.NXT. > RFC 9293 requires a challenge ACK for a non-exact in-window RST. > > Patch 1 applies the RFC 5961 sequence check to request sockets and shares > the per-netns challenge ACK quota with the established-socket path. > Patch 2 adds a compact packetdrill regression test for exact, non-exact, > RST|ACK, and out-of-window cases. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,1/2] tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/a28c4fcbf774 - [net,2/2] selftests/net: packetdrill: cover RST validation in SYN-RECEIVED https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7bb18355e599 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html