From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/crypto: make crypto.c explicitly non-modular
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:56:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17854864.AYbZjbhEmU@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456604449-4666-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
On Saturday 27 February 2016 15:20:49 Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> As of commit 47134e6084f70fdf4381af75d4569cec6c7ebd50 ("fs crypto:
> add Makefile and Kconfig") the compile of fs/crypto/crypto.c tripped
> my local audit for non-modules using modular infrastructure vs. their
> built in counterparts.
>
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> config FS_ENCRYPTION
> bool "FS Encryption (Per-file encryption)"
>
> combined with:
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION) += crypto.o policy.o keyinfo.o
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>
> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
>
> Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular
> case, the use of fs_initcall (which seems appropriate for fs code)
> means the init comes slightly earlier. However boot testing an
> x86-64 defconfig didn't show this to be causing any issues.
>
> We replace module.h with moduleparam.h since the file does declare
> some module parameters, and leaving them as such is currently the
> easiest way to remain compatible with existing boot arg use cases.
>
So why not make the option a 'tristate' instead? It looks like
that was intended here, and we should always try to make all
code loadable as modules if possible.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-29 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-27 20:20 [PATCH] fs/crypto: make crypto.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker
2016-02-29 9:56 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-29 14:31 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-03-02 17:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17854864.AYbZjbhEmU@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox