From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
alexis.lothore@bootlin.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: Cleanup rx coalescing computation when using RIWT
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 01:50:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178580821438.2913307.10017683576948175054.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802114015.214212-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 13:40:12 +0200 you wrote:
> Currently when configuring interrupt coalescing on devices that relies
> on the Receive Interrupt Watchdog Timer feature of dwmac, the
> computation of the RIWT timings leads to off-by-one values when
> reporting the timings back to userspace.
>
> RIWT works by arming a watchdog timer upon receiving frames with the RI
> bit not set in the descriptor. The timer duration is expressed in units
> of 256 stmmac clock ticks, and therefore requires a bit of computation
> to derive it :
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Comment the magic numbers in RIWT computation
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b6a89c8ef34f
- [net-next,2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ae88f78bc4eb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 11:40 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: Cleanup rx coalescing computation when using RIWT Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-02 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Comment the magic numbers in RIWT computation Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-02 15:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-02 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: stmmac: ethtool: Address off-by-one when reading the coal rx-usecs Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-02 15:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-02 20:29 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-02 23:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-04 1:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178580821438.2913307.10017683576948175054.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox