From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Rajesh Venkatasubramanian <vrajesh@umich.edu>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178970000.1082049291@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404151752210.9569-100000@localhost.localdomain>
>> > Any ideas how we might handle latency from vmtruncate (and
>> > try_to_unmap) if using prio_tree with i_shared_lock spinlock?
>>
>> I've been thinking about that. My rough plan is to go wild, naked and lockless.
>> If we arrange things in the correct order, new entries onto the list would
>
> It's quite easy if there's a list - though I'm not that eager to go wild,
> naked and lockless with you! But what if there's a prio_tree?
I still think my list-of-lists patch fixes the original problem, and is
simpler ... I'll try to get it updated, and sent out.
M.,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-04 12:33 [PATCH] anobjrmap 9 priority mjb tree Hugh Dickins
2004-04-09 20:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-09 21:31 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-09 21:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-09 23:17 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-09 21:51 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-09 22:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-09 22:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-11 16:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-11 17:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 4:32 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-12 5:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-12 18:58 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-12 19:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 19:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-12 19:38 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-12 21:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-12 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-12 21:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-14 20:18 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-15 0:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 0:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-15 3:40 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-15 6:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-15 10:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-15 12:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 15:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-15 16:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-15 17:14 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2004-04-15 17:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-15 18:42 ` Dave McCracken
[not found] ` <192710000.1082052992@flay>
2004-04-15 18:47 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-15 22:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 22:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 13:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-15 14:41 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178970000.1082049291@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vrajesh@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox