public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>, Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
	ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	Zang Leigang <zangleigang@hisilicon.com>,
	Avi Shchislowski <Avi.Shchislowski@wdc.com>,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: ufshpb: Region inactivation in host mode
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:19:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1796371666.41615958582147.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <064483451ff0d9ef8703871332ea5c3b@codeaurora.org>

>>>> >> ---
>>>> >>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>> >>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h |  1 +
>>>> >>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>>>> >> index 6f4fd22eaf2f..0744feb4d484 100644
>>>> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>>>> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>>>> >> @@ -907,6 +907,7 @@ static int ufshpb_execute_umap_req(struct
>>>> >> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>      blk_execute_rq_nowait(q, NULL, req, 1, ufshpb_umap_req_compl_fn);
>>>> >>
>>>> >> +    hpb->stats.umap_req_cnt++;
>>>> >>      return 0;
>>>> >>  }
>>>> >>
>>>> >> @@ -1103,6 +1104,12 @@ static int ufshpb_issue_umap_req(struct
>>>> >> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>>>> >>      return -EAGAIN;
>>>> >>  }
>>>> >>
>>>> >> +static int ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>>>> >> +                                    struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>>>> >> +{
>>>> >> +    return ufshpb_issue_umap_req(hpb, rgn);
>>>> >> +}
>>>> >> +
>>>> >>  static int ufshpb_issue_umap_all_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>>>> >>  {
>>>> >>      return ufshpb_issue_umap_req(hpb, NULL);
>>>> >> @@ -1115,6 +1122,10 @@ static void __ufshpb_evict_region(struct
>>>> >> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>>>> >>      struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn;
>>>> >>      int srgn_idx;
>>>> >>
>>>> >> +
>>>> >> +    if (hpb->is_hcm && ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req(hpb, rgn))
>>>> >
>>>> > __ufshpb_evict_region() is called with rgn_state_lock held and IRQ
>>>> > disabled,
>>>> > when ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req() invokes blk_execute_rq_nowait(),
>>>> > below
>>>> > warning shall pop up every time, fix it?
>>>> >
>>>> > void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk
>>>> > *bd_disk,
>>>> >                  struct request *rq, int at_head,
>>>> >                          rq_end_io_fn *done)
>>>> > {
>>>> >       WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
>>>> > ...
>>>> >
>>>> 
>>>> Moreover, since we are here with rgn_state_lock held and IRQ 
>>>> disabled,
>>>> in ufshpb_get_req(), rq = kmem_cache_alloc(hpb->map_req_cache,
>>>> GFP_KERNEL)
>>>> has the GFP_KERNEL flag, scheduling while atomic???
>>> I think your comment applies to  ufshpb_issue_umap_all_req as well,
>>> Which is called from slave_configure/scsi_add_lun.
>>> 
>>> Since the host-mode series is utilizing the framework laid by the 
>>> device-mode,
>>> Maybe you can add this comment to  Daejun's last version?
>> 
>> Hi Avri, Can Guo
>> 
>> I think ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req() can be moved to end of
>> ufshpb_evict_region().
>> Then we can avoid rgn_state_lock when it sends unmap command.
> 
>I am not the expert here, please you two fix it. I am just reporting
>what can be wrong. Anyways, ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req() should not
>be called with rgn_state_lock held - think about below (another deadly)
>scenario.
> 
>lock(rgn_state_lock)
>   ufshpb_issue_umap_single_req()
>     ufshpb_prep()
>        lock(rgn_state_lock)   <---------- recursive spin_lock
> 
>BTW, @Daejun shouldn't we stop passthrough cmds from stepping
>into ufshpb_prep()? In current code, you are trying to use below
>check to block cmds other than write/discard/read, but a passthrough
>cmd can not be blocked by the check.
> 
>          if (!ufshpb_is_write_or_discard_cmd(cmd) &&
>              !ufshpb_is_read_cmd(cmd) )
>                  return 0;

I found this problem too. I fixed it and submit next patch.

if (blk_rq_is_scsi(cmd->request) ||
	    (!ufshpb_is_write_or_discard_cmd(cmd) &&
	    !ufshpb_is_read_cmd(cmd)))
		return 0;


Thanks,
Daejun

>Thanks,
>Can Guo.
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Daejun
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Avri
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Can Guo.
>>>> 
>>>> > Thanks.
>>>> > Can Guo.
>>>> >
>>>> >> +            return;
>>>> >> +
>>>> >>      lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
>>>> >>
>>>> >>      dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "evict region %d\n",
>>>> >> rgn->rgn_idx);
>>>> >> @@ -1855,6 +1866,7 @@ ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_noti_cnt);
>>>> >>  ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_active_cnt);
>>>> >>  ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(rb_inactive_cnt);
>>>> >>  ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(map_req_cnt);
>>>> >> +ufshpb_sysfs_attr_show_func(umap_req_cnt);
>>>> >>
>>>> >>  static struct attribute *hpb_dev_stat_attrs[] = {
>>>> >>      &dev_attr_hit_cnt.attr,
>>>> >> @@ -1863,6 +1875,7 @@ static struct attribute *hpb_dev_stat_attrs[] =
>>>> >> {
>>>> >>      &dev_attr_rb_active_cnt.attr,
>>>> >>      &dev_attr_rb_inactive_cnt.attr,
>>>> >>      &dev_attr_map_req_cnt.attr,
>>>> >> +    &dev_attr_umap_req_cnt.attr,
>>>> >>      NULL,
>>>> >>  };
>>>> >>
>>>> >> @@ -1978,6 +1991,7 @@ static void ufshpb_stat_init(struct ufshpb_lu
>>>> >> *hpb)
>>>> >>      hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt = 0;
>>>> >>      hpb->stats.rb_inactive_cnt = 0;
>>>> >>      hpb->stats.map_req_cnt = 0;
>>>> >> +    hpb->stats.umap_req_cnt = 0;
>>>> >>  }
>>>> >>
>>>> >>  static void ufshpb_param_init(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>>>> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>>>> >> index bd4308010466..84598a317897 100644
>>>> >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>>>> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>>>> >> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ struct ufshpb_stats {
>>>> >>      u64 rb_inactive_cnt;
>>>> >>      u64 map_req_cnt;
>>>> >>      u64 pre_req_cnt;
>>>> >> +    u64 umap_req_cnt;
>>>> >>  };
>>>> >>
>>>> >>  struct ufshpb_lu {
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-17  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 13:24 [PATCH v5 00/10] Add Host control mode to HPB Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] scsi: ufshpb: Cache HPB Control mode on init Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add host control mode support to rsp_upiu Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add region's reads counter Avri Altman
2021-03-11  7:52   ` Can Guo
2021-03-11  8:04     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-11  8:07       ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  3:16   ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  9:20     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15  9:31       ` Can Guo
2021-03-17  9:19         ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15  8:40   ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  9:22     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] scsi: ufshpb: Make eviction depends on region's reads Avri Altman
2021-03-11  7:53   ` Can Guo
2021-03-11  8:06     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15  8:30   ` Can Guo
2021-03-16  8:34     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: ufshpb: Region inactivation in host mode Avri Altman
2021-03-11  8:20   ` Can Guo
2021-03-11  9:03     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15  4:02   ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  7:33     ` Can Guo
2021-03-16  8:30       ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17  1:23         ` Can Guo
2021-03-17  2:28         ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17  4:41           ` Can Guo
2021-03-17  5:19             ` Daejun Park [this message]
2021-03-17  5:34               ` Can Guo
2021-03-17  5:42                 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17  7:59             ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response Avri Altman
2021-03-15  1:34   ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  6:40     ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  7:42     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 10:56   ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 11:23     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 12:12       ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 12:22         ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 13:50           ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 14:22             ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 14:36               ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 15:46                 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-18  1:00                   ` Can Guo
2021-03-18  8:04                     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add "Cold" regions timer Avri Altman
2021-03-15  1:37   ` Can Guo
2021-03-15  7:54     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15  9:36   ` Can Guo
2021-03-16  9:21     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17  2:45       ` Can Guo
2021-03-17  7:55         ` Avri Altman
2021-06-01 16:22           ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] scsi: ufshpb: Limit the number of inflight map requests Avri Altman
2021-03-15  8:31   ` Can Guo
2021-03-16  8:32     ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add support for host control mode Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] scsi: ufshpb: Make host mode parameters configurable Avri Altman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1796371666.41615958582147.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4 \
    --to=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=Avi.Shchislowski@wdc.com \
    --cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=zangleigang@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox