From: Andrew McGregor <andrew@indranet.co.nz>
To: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!)
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 01:12:12 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18030000.1041941532@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030107040829.E1406@almesberger.net>
No, he really meant without. I don't know if Valdis saw the presentation
that went with that draft, but I did (last IETF in Yokohama). The example
was a 10Gbps link with a 250ms RTT (plausibly, a trans-pacific cable
lambda). There are tens of thousands of 9k packets in the window (yep, 100
*megabytes* in flight in the cable!), and it does take several hours with
exactly zero drops to get the connection to fill the 10Gbps. After one
dropped packet, it can take an hour to get back to full utilisation. The
graphs are really startling to look at :-)
That quirk just meant the numbers were off by a few orders of magnitude.
If anyone wants to look at that further, I think there are URLs in the
draft. If not, I can dig them out of the proceedings.
Andrew
--On Tuesday, January 07, 2003 04:08:29 -0300 Werner Almesberger
<wa@almesberger.net> wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> That's not the problem. The problem is that TCP slow-start itself (and
>> some of the related congestion control stuff) has some issues scaling to
>> the very high end.
>
> I'm very well aware of that ;-) But what you wrote was:
>
>> it takes *hours* without a
>> packet drop to get the window open *all* the way
>
> Or did you mean "after" instead of "without" ? Or maybe "into
> equilibrium" instead of "the window open ..." ? (After all, the
> window isn't only open, but it's been blown off its hinges.)
>
> In any case, your statement accurately describes a somewhat
> surprising quirk in Linux TCP performance as of only a bit more
> than six years ago :)
>
> - Werner
>
> --
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net
> /
> /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-07 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-05 1:54 Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!) Andre Hedrick
2003-01-05 2:47 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-05 3:26 ` NEURONET
2003-01-05 4:11 ` NEURONET
2003-01-05 4:41 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-05 6:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-06 3:06 ` Oliver Xymoron
2003-01-06 3:38 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-06 5:24 ` Oliver Xymoron
2003-01-06 10:24 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-06 16:51 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-07 0:28 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-07 20:36 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-07 22:45 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-08 0:04 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-08 1:43 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-08 1:08 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-08 16:48 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-01-08 19:37 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-07 0:39 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-07 4:20 ` Oliver Xymoron
2003-01-07 5:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-07 6:16 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-07 6:43 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-07 7:08 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-07 8:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-07 8:14 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-07 8:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-07 17:07 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-07 12:12 ` Andrew McGregor [this message]
2003-01-07 6:45 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-01-07 7:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-07 11:24 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-07 10:31 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-01-08 19:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-01-08 20:09 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-08 20:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-01-07 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-07 12:31 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-07 13:58 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-07 23:09 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-07 16:21 ` Oliver Xymoron
2003-01-07 13:04 ` Lionel Bouton
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.10301051924140.421-100000@master.linux-ide.o rg>
2003-01-06 7:14 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-01-06 7:53 ` Linux iSCSI Initiator Andre Hedrick
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.10301052337150.421-100000@master.linux-ide.o rg>
2003-01-06 9:10 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-01-06 9:28 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-06 3:25 ` Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!) Richard Stallman
2003-01-06 4:08 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-06 20:49 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-05 22:51 Adam J. Richter
[not found] <fa.kccjmvv.13go3jp@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.hjtum4v.fki8p1@ifi.uio.no>
2003-01-08 1:07 ` walt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18030000.1041941532@localhost.localdomain \
--to=andrew@indranet.co.nz \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox