From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:27:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18122.9034.504690.370294@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Robin Lee Powell on Monday August 20
On Monday August 20, rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org wrote:
> (cc's to me appreciated)
>
> It would be really, really nice if "umount -f" against a hung NFS
> mount actually worked on Linux. As much as I hate Solaris, I
> consider it the gold standard in this case: If I say
> "umount -f /mount/that/is/hung" it just goes away, immediately, and
> anything still trying to use it dies (with EIO, I'm told).
Have you tried "umount -l"? How far is that from your requirements?
Alternately:
mount --move /problem/path /somewhere/else
umount -f /somewhere/else
umount -l /somewhere/else
might be a little closer to what you want.
Though I agree that it would be nice if we could convince all
subsequent requests to a server to fail EIO instead of just the
currently active ones. I'm not sure that just changing "umount -f" is
the right interface though.... Maybe if all the server handles
appeared in sysfs and have an attribute which you could set to cause
all requests to fail...
NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-20 22:54 NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested Robin Lee Powell
2007-08-20 23:27 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2007-08-20 23:34 ` Robin Lee Powell
2007-08-21 1:51 ` Salah Coronya
2007-08-21 16:43 ` John Stoffel
2007-08-21 16:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-21 17:01 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-21 17:14 ` Chakri n
2007-08-21 17:14 ` Robin Lee Powell
2007-08-21 17:18 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-21 18:50 ` John Stoffel
2007-08-21 19:04 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-21 19:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-24 15:09 ` Ric Wheeler
2007-08-24 15:37 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-24 15:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-21 23:04 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-22 10:03 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-22 15:26 ` John Stoffel
2007-08-31 8:06 ` Ian Kent
2007-08-31 15:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-31 15:30 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18122.9034.504690.370294@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox