public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix iostat related lock protection
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:54:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1815f3c2-0802-5b3f-7e98-9f89c5b9e07d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610183240.2269085-1-daeho43@gmail.com>

On 2022/6/11 2:32, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> 
> Made iostat related locks safe to be called from irq context again.
> 

Will be better to add a 'Fixes' line?

Thanks,

> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/iostat.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/iostat.c b/fs/f2fs/iostat.c
> index be599f31d3c4..d84c5f6cc09d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/iostat.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/iostat.c
> @@ -91,8 +91,9 @@ static inline void __record_iostat_latency(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   	unsigned int cnt;
>   	struct f2fs_iostat_latency iostat_lat[MAX_IO_TYPE][NR_PAGE_TYPE];
>   	struct iostat_lat_info *io_lat = sbi->iostat_io_lat;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>   
> -	spin_lock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock, flags);
>   	for (idx = 0; idx < MAX_IO_TYPE; idx++) {
>   		for (io = 0; io < NR_PAGE_TYPE; io++) {
>   			cnt = io_lat->bio_cnt[idx][io];
> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static inline void __record_iostat_latency(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   			io_lat->bio_cnt[idx][io] = 0;
>   		}
>   	}
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock, flags);
>   
>   	trace_f2fs_iostat_latency(sbi, iostat_lat);
>   }
> @@ -115,14 +116,15 @@ static inline void f2fs_record_iostat(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   {
>   	unsigned long long iostat_diff[NR_IO_TYPE];
>   	int i;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>   
>   	if (time_is_after_jiffies(sbi->iostat_next_period))
>   		return;
>   
>   	/* Need double check under the lock */
> -	spin_lock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->iostat_lock, flags);
>   	if (time_is_after_jiffies(sbi->iostat_next_period)) {
> -		spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->iostat_lock, flags);
>   		return;
>   	}
>   	sbi->iostat_next_period = jiffies +
> @@ -133,7 +135,7 @@ static inline void f2fs_record_iostat(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   				sbi->prev_rw_iostat[i];
>   		sbi->prev_rw_iostat[i] = sbi->rw_iostat[i];
>   	}
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->iostat_lock, flags);
>   
>   	trace_f2fs_iostat(sbi, iostat_diff);
>   
> @@ -145,25 +147,27 @@ void f2fs_reset_iostat(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   	struct iostat_lat_info *io_lat = sbi->iostat_io_lat;
>   	int i;
>   
> -	spin_lock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&sbi->iostat_lock);
>   	for (i = 0; i < NR_IO_TYPE; i++) {
>   		sbi->rw_iostat[i] = 0;
>   		sbi->prev_rw_iostat[i] = 0;
>   	}
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&sbi->iostat_lock);
>   
> -	spin_lock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
>   	memset(io_lat, 0, sizeof(struct iostat_lat_info));
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
>   }
>   
>   void f2fs_update_iostat(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   			enum iostat_type type, unsigned long long io_bytes)
>   {
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
>   	if (!sbi->iostat_enable)
>   		return;
>   
> -	spin_lock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->iostat_lock, flags);
>   	sbi->rw_iostat[type] += io_bytes;
>   
>   	if (type == APP_BUFFERED_IO || type == APP_DIRECT_IO)
> @@ -172,7 +176,7 @@ void f2fs_update_iostat(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	if (type == APP_BUFFERED_READ_IO || type == APP_DIRECT_READ_IO)
>   		sbi->rw_iostat[APP_READ_IO] += io_bytes;
>   
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->iostat_lock, flags);
>   
>   	f2fs_record_iostat(sbi);
>   }
> @@ -185,6 +189,7 @@ static inline void __update_iostat_latency(struct bio_iostat_ctx *iostat_ctx,
>   	struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = iostat_ctx->sbi;
>   	struct iostat_lat_info *io_lat = sbi->iostat_io_lat;
>   	int idx;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>   
>   	if (!sbi->iostat_enable)
>   		return;
> @@ -202,12 +207,12 @@ static inline void __update_iostat_latency(struct bio_iostat_ctx *iostat_ctx,
>   			idx = WRITE_ASYNC_IO;
>   	}
>   
> -	spin_lock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock, flags);
>   	io_lat->sum_lat[idx][iotype] += ts_diff;
>   	io_lat->bio_cnt[idx][iotype]++;
>   	if (ts_diff > io_lat->peak_lat[idx][iotype])
>   		io_lat->peak_lat[idx][iotype] = ts_diff;
> -	spin_unlock_bh(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sbi->iostat_lat_lock, flags);
>   }
>   
>   void iostat_update_and_unbind_ctx(struct bio *bio, int rw)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10 18:32 [PATCH] f2fs: fix iostat related lock protection Daeho Jeong
2022-06-15  7:54 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2022-06-15 16:54   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-16  2:11     ` Chao Yu
2022-06-16 16:22       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17  1:58         ` Chao Yu
2022-06-17 22:31           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-19  0:26     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1815f3c2-0802-5b3f-7e98-9f89c5b9e07d@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox