From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753458AbbJSKzV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:55:21 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34650 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751737AbbJSKzS (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:55:18 -0400
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
	Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
	Kingdom.
	Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+YXJx0AVvdk6op=odzYRoM6+kSQFnuJsLSCTT9=wjqAxg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACT4Y+YXJx0AVvdk6op=odzYRoM6+kSQFnuJsLSCTT9=wjqAxg@mail.gmail.com> <CACT4Y+bq71x0=h2MPfXD=DY+d0EkU0GWZdCCVNpZ0CtNYVAiHQ@mail.gmail.com> <4765.1444936919@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <CACT4Y+YTQsuNxDM4Zudb=tx0f8s+LbApEXoW2XcYZV84aMtADA@mail.gmail.com> <17443.1445250818@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, syzkaller@googlegroups.com, james.l.morris@oracle.com,
        serge@hallyn.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>, Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Subject: Re: GPF in keyring_destroy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <18235.1445252109.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:55:09 +0100
Message-ID: <18236.1445252109@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:

> Do you mean in addition or instead of the previous one? From your
> description, it sounds like it alone should prevent the crash.

I'm going to submit them both, so if you could test them together.  You're
right, though, I think this should also prevent the crash.

David