From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KEYS: Allow keyctl_revoke() on keys that have SETATTR but not WRITE perm
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:38:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18269.1249400306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090804151747.GA3698@us.ibm.com>
Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Code seems to match the comment, and I see no docs saying this (SETATTR
> implies revoke) shouldn't be the case, so I guess that call is purely
> up to you :)
Without this, you can't revoke keys that don't have an update method.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-04 14:55 [PATCH 1/6] KEYS: Deal with dead-type keys appropriately David Howells
2009-08-04 14:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] KEYS: Allow keyctl_revoke() on keys that have SETATTR but not WRITE perm David Howells
2009-08-04 15:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 15:38 ` David Howells [this message]
2009-08-04 15:43 ` David Howells
2009-08-04 14:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] KEYS: Flag dead keys to induce EKEYREVOKED David Howells
2009-08-04 18:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 14:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] KEYS: Add garbage collection for dead, revoked and expired keys David Howells
2009-08-04 18:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 20:30 ` David Howells
2009-08-04 21:01 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 22:00 ` David Howells
2009-08-04 22:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 14:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] KEYS: Make /proc/keys use keyid not numread as file position David Howells
2009-08-04 14:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] KEYS: Do some whitespace cleanups David Howells
2009-08-04 18:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-08-04 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] KEYS: Deal with dead-type keys appropriately Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18269.1249400306@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox