From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757753AbdKOLOr (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 06:14:47 -0500 Received: from mail.sigma-star.at ([95.130.255.111]:45996 "EHLO mail.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757734AbdKOLOn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 06:14:43 -0500 From: Richard Weinberger To: Krzysztof Mazur Cc: Jeff Dike , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: use POSIX ucontext_t instead of struct ucontext Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:15:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1828554.ETQJSmL9mu@blindfold> In-Reply-To: <20171115110416.GA29538@shrek.podlesie.net> References: <20171115101239.4882-1-krzysiek@podlesie.net> <1518438.KRCSCszYuI@blindfold> <20171115110416.GA29538@shrek.podlesie.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch, 15. November 2017, 12:04:16 CET schrieb Krzysztof Mazur: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:19:41AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 15. November 2017, 11:12:39 CET schrieb Krzysztof Mazur: > > > glibc 2.26 removed the 'struct ucontext' to "improve" POSIX compliance > > > and break programs, including User Mode Linux. Fix User Mode Linux > > > by using POSIX ucontext_t. > > > > > > This fixes: > > > > > > arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c: In function 'hard_handler': > > > arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c:163:22: error: dereferencing pointer to > > > incomplete type 'struct ucontext' mcontext_t *mc = &uc->uc_mcontext; > > > arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c: In function 'stub_segv_handler': > > > arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c:16:13: error: dereferencing pointer to > > > incomplete > > > type 'struct ucontext' &uc->uc_mcontext); > > > > Do all older glibcs have ucontext_t? > > Otherwise this patch will break other stuff. > > Yes, ucontext_t typedef was always available. They changed: > > typedef struct ucontext { ... } ucontex_t; > > to > > typedef struct ucontext_t { ... } ucontex_t; > > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.26#Removal_of_.27struct_ucontext > .27 Okay, then we can mark your patch as stable and hope for the best. ;-) Thanks, //richard