From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@fb.com,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write()
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 06:25:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18295.1485811542@jrobl> (raw)
Peter Zijlstra,
May I ask you a question?
v4.10-rc1 got a commit
f831948 2016-11-30 locking/lockdep: Provide a type check for lock_is_held
I've tested a little and lockdep splat a stack trace.
{
DECLARE_RWSEM(rw);
static struct lock_class_key key;
lockdep_set_class(&rw, &key);
down_read(&rw);
lockdep_assert_held_read(&rw);
up_read(&rw);
down_write(&rw);
lockdep_assert_held_exclusive(&rw);
up_write(&rw);
downgrade_write(&rw);
lockdep_assert_held_read(&rw); <-- here
up_read(&rw);
}
I was expecting that lockdep_assert_held_read() splat nothing after
downgrade_write(). Is this warning an intentional behaviour?
Also the final up_read() gives me a warning too. It is produced at
lockdep.c:3514:lock_release(): DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0)
As an additional information, I increased some lockdep constants.
Do you think this is related?
include/linux/lockdep.h
+#define MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES (8UL + 4)
+#define MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS (13 + 3)
kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
+#define MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES (32768UL << 5)
+#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS (16 + 5)
+#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES (524288UL << 5)
J. R. Okajima
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 21:25 J. R. Okajima [this message]
2017-01-30 21:30 ` Q: lockdep_assert_held_read() after downgrade_write() Jens Axboe
2017-01-31 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-31 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-31 14:23 ` Waiman Long
2017-01-31 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-31 15:40 ` J. R. Okajima
2017-01-31 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-02 16:33 ` J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: consolidate by new find_held_lock() J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] lockdep: consolidate by new validate_held_lock() J. R. Okajima
2017-02-14 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 11:25 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Factor out the validate_held_lock() helper function tip-bot for J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: new annotation lock_downgrade() J. R. Okajima
2017-02-02 17:59 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-02 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-02 21:05 ` J. R. Okajima
2017-02-14 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 11:25 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Add new check to lock_downgrade() tip-bot for J. R. Okajima
2017-03-16 11:24 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Factor out the find_held_lock() helper function tip-bot for J. R. Okajima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18295.1485811542@jrobl \
--to=hooanon05g@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox