Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: Introduce Window-Assisted CPU utilization Tracking

[Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org>]

On 2016-10-28 00:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:10:41AM -0700, Vikram Mulukutla wrote:
>> +void walt_finish_migrate(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *dest_rq, 
>> bool locked)
>> +{
>> +	u64 wallclock;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	if (!p->on_rq && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (locked == false)
>> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dest_rq->lock, flags);
>> +
> 
>> +
>> +	if (locked == false)
>> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dest_rq->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void walt_prepare_migrate(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *src_rq, 
>> bool locked)
>> +{
>> +	u64 wallclock;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +	if (!p->on_rq && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (locked == false)
>> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&src_rq->lock, flags);
>> +
> 
>> +
>> +	if (locked == false)
>> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&src_rq->lock, flags);
>> +}
> 
> Seriously bad style that. Please, less bonghits before writing code.

This was my bad personal attempt at eliminating double-locking from the 
original code.
This was pointed out earlier and shall go away once I can come up with a 
way to merge
this into enqeue/dequeue sans bonghits :-)