From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE30C6FD1F for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 18:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230355AbjCVSeL (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:34:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37434 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229684AbjCVSeK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:34:10 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CFBC1B565; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1679510049; x=1711046049; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9NAyFsvY5+wb9A+DTRm5DkiLvM20CJJWJW3U7Px2UqU=; b=RrSdMyED94YwKI9ngRKOU56iCNM9vLOZRIbti95Ed9ZYO/qlvPVzA9Fu xN4BtslWsfpkZ57jIZjDt/G5cr3K2bg34+gtXgFcsFyqSGDz5qmOqXDVm bF2dwQDON0f64ArcMYTC3lmdUYxwefBpGa92VDS5qGEYpNx/vwFxBxTF/ 4/OHkfvcS0Wnnvh68SL4K77JgpvjCEOWtt+sYUlovFQQYngtWfXD/nizH bxzlV7mObGH4PdjAMEy1mUVpSbk+d70xv9HGmDrc13BSSJS+KGPCdPZcp JM1W5u0VqLz4ZyJWCzh4jixOw1Ad/DGxzWQC13gKuBAmpIX1fUSU1i8H8 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10657"; a="341660702" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,282,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="341660702" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2023 11:34:08 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10657"; a="712359834" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,282,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="712359834" Received: from mtfreder-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.35.23]) ([10.209.35.23]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2023 11:34:08 -0700 Message-ID: <18431bad-8595-143b-e8af-14e448af871c@intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:34:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ACPI/boot: Improve __acpi_acquire_global_lock Content-Language: en-US To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Uros Bizjak Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" References: <20230320212012.12704-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/22/23 11:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > or please let me know if you want me to pick this up (in which case it > will require an ACK from one of the x86 maintainers). I'll pull it into x86/acpi. I'm kinda shocked the compiler is so clueless, but this makes the C code more readable anyway. Win/win, I guess.