From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759152Ab3FMXxm (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:53:42 -0400 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:52757 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759089Ab3FMXxl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:53:41 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , James Hogan , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Patrice Chotard Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: add function to parse generic pinconfig properties from a dt node Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 01:53:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1862891.4yIecp615h@avalon> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.13-gentoo; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201306102139.32444.heiko@sntech.de> <201306131723.04721.heiko@sntech.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Thursday 13 June 2013 17:36:00 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >> Ok, I'll see that I get this fixed :-) > > > > Hmm ... what is the meaning of the argument of bias-disable and bias-high- > > impedance, as the kernel-doc in pinconf-generic.h does not tell? > > I think those arguments are N/A, ignored, doesn't matter. > If these options were typed, they would be bool. > > Please improve documentation if you can... sorry for all the > rough edges. > > > bias-bus-hold ignores its argument and we already clarified that the > > pull-* do have != 0 or 0 argument. > > I think in the DT binding, both these forms: > > bias-pull-up; > bias-pull-up = <150000>; > > Should be allowed. > > So when parsing, you first check if it exists, then if there > is an argument, if there is no value supplied, just set it > to 1, as that is clearly != 0... What's the expected way to disable pull-ups in DT ? Should it be 'bias-pull-up = <0>;' or 'bias-disable;' ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart