Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63

["Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>]

> page_test 10000 123.9       210630.00 System Allocations & Pages/second
> page_test 10000 102.8       174760.00 System Allocations & Pages/second
> page_test 10010 101.898       173226.77 System Allocations & Pages/second
> ^^^^^Here we are still slowe then 2.4.19
>
> brk_test 10010 48.951       832167.83 System Memory Allocations/second
> brk_test 10000 43.7       742900.00 System Memory Allocations/second
> brk_test 10020 41.018       697305.39 System Memory Allocations/second
> ^^^^Slower then .58 and a lot slower then 2.4.19
>
> exec_test 10000 13.8           69.00 Program Loads/second
> exec_test 10030 12.8614           64.31 Program Loads/second
> exec_test 10020 12.7745           63.87 Program Loads/second
> ^^^^ Slower then 2.4.19
> 
> fork_test 10000 44.8         4480.00 Task Creations/second
> fork_test 10020 24.8503         2485.03 Task Creations/second
> fork_test 10000 23.2         2320.00 Task Creations/second
> ^^^^^ A lot slower then 2.4.19

Could you compare 63 mainline to -mjb or -mm with objrmap patches in?
I think you'll get significant improvements on the tests above.

> mem_rtns_1 10000 27.7       831000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
> mem_rtns_1 10000 24.1       723000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
> mem_rtns_1 10020 22.7545       682634.73 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
> ^^^^^Slow, slow, slow...
> 
> misc_rtns_1 10000 782.2         7822.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
> misc_rtns_1 10000 706         7060.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
> misc_rtns_1 10000 686.9         6869.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
> ^^^^ Slow too...
> 
> shared_memory 10000 2227.4       222740.00 Shared Memory Operations/second
> shared_memory 10000 1973.1       197310.00 Shared Memory Operations/second
> shared_memory 10000 1955.2       195520.00 Shared Memory Operations/second
> ^^^^Slow, slow, slow...

And possibly those three as well, though I'm less sure.
 
Thanks,

M.