From: rajpat@codeaurora.org
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org, msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com,
skakit@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 6/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 nodes
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 20:58:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18995b9913c9acb7880b01a4f61ee5d0@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n51YGqp701EzUs1Q1PG89SECVQDdUPsiJ8P95xFj0UFs=A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021-08-26 23:41, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rajesh Patil (2021-08-26 06:15:30)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> index 7c106c0..65126a7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> @@ -225,6 +225,10 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> +&qupv3_id_1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>
> Why enable this here but not any of the i2c/spi/uart devices that are a
> child? Can this hunk be split off to a different patch?
>
Currently there is no usecase on qup1 and hence not enabled.
Regarding splitting this, I did not get the exact reason why we need to
split. This patch adds all the qup wrapper1 nodes and we are enabling it
in board file.
>> &sdhc_1 {
>> status = "okay";
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> index a3c11b0..32f411f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> @@ -2040,6 +2469,46 @@
>> function = "qup07";
>> };
>>
>> + qup_i2c8_data_clk:qup-i2c8-data-clk {
>
> Unstick please.
>
OKay.
>> + pins = "gpio32", "gpio33";
>> + function = "qup10";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c9_data_clk:qup-i2c9-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio36", "gpio37";
>> + function = "qup11";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c10_data_clk:qup-i2c10-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio40", "gpio41";
>> + function = "qup12";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c11_data_clk:qup-i2c11-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio44", "gpio45";
>> + function = "qup13";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c12_data_clk:qup-i2c12-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio48", "gpio49";
>> + function = "qup14";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c13_data_clk:qup-i2c13-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio52", "gpio53";
>> + function = "qup15";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c14_data_clk:qup-i2c14-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio56", "gpio57";
>> + function = "qup16";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qup_i2c15_data_clk:qup-i2c15-data-clk {
>> + pins = "gpio60", "gpio61";
>> + function = "qup17";
>> + };
>
> All of these.
>
>> +
>> qup_spi0_data_clk: qup-spi0-data-clk {
>> pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2";
>> function = "qup00";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 13:15 [PATCH V6 0/7] Add QSPI and QUPv3 DT nodes for SC7280 SoC Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 1/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QSPI node Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 18:02 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-31 15:29 ` rajpat
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 2/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure SPI-NOR FLASH for sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 18:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 3/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_0 nodes Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 18:06 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-31 15:28 ` rajpat
2021-08-26 20:08 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 4/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Update QUPv3 UART5 DT node Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 21:01 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2021-08-31 15:27 ` rajpat
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 5/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Configure uart7 to support bluetooth on sc7280-idp Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 6/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add QUPv3 wrapper_1 nodes Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 18:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-31 15:28 ` rajpat [this message]
2021-09-01 5:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-26 13:15 ` [PATCH V6 7/7] arm64: dts: sc7280: Add aliases for I2C and SPI Rajesh Patil
2021-08-26 18:12 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-31 15:29 ` rajpat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18995b9913c9acb7880b01a4f61ee5d0@codeaurora.org \
--to=rajpat@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msavaliy@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skakit@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox