From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/6] Perf kvm commands bug fix
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 07:52:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <189e060b-207b-469f-9b6e-314380d12a42@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWcf7F1QvWXzAD_KMpOnnKGw9PFM7mNtgzp_jh4Vi6V-w@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/18/2025 5:12 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 10:56 PM Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> his patch-set fixes perf kvm commands issues, like missed memory
>> allocation check/free, out of range memory access and especially the
>> issue that fails to sample guest with "perf kvm record/top" commands on
>> Intel platforms.
>>
>> The commit 634d36f82517 ("perf record: Just use "cycles:P" as the
>> default event") changes to use PEBS event to do sampling by default
>> including guest sampling. This breaks host to sample guest with commands
>> "perf kvm record/top" on Intel platforms.
> Huh? That change is:
> ```
> $ git show 634d36f82517
> commit 634d36f82517eb5c6a9b9ec7fe3ba19dbbcb7809
> Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue Oct 15 23:23:58 2024 -0700
>
> perf record: Just use "cycles:P" as the default event
>
> The fallback logic can add ":u" modifier if needed.
> ...
> - bool can_profile_kernel = perf_event_paranoid_check(1);
> -
> - err = parse_event(rec->evlist, can_profile_kernel ?
> "cycles:P" : "cycles:Pu");
> + err = parse_event(rec->evlist, "cycles:P");
> ...
> ```
> isn't the precision the same before and after? I think you've blamed
> the wrong patch.
>
> The change to use cycles:P looks to come from commit 7b100989b4f6
> ("perf evlist: Remove __evlist__add_default") but the old code was
> doing things like "evsel->precise_max = true;" so I think I was just
> carrying forward behavior. The use of precise_max comes from commit
> 4e8a5c155137 ("perf evsel: Fix max perf_event_attr.precise_ip
> detection") from over 6 years ago, and the behavior before that also
> appears to have been to use the maximum supported precision.
>
> Apart from the blame and commit message being off I think the change
> is okay, delta my usual complaint that weak symbols are the devil's
> work.
Hmm, yeah, you're right. Thanks for correcting this.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> Since the change "KVM: x86/pmu: Add basic support to enable guest PEBS
>> via DS"[1] starts, host loses the capability to sample guest with PEBS
>> since all PEBS related MSRs are switched to guest value after vm-entry,
>> like IA32_DS_AREA MSR is switched to guest GVA at vm-entry. This leads
>> to PEBS events can't be used to sample guest by host, otherwise no guest
>> PEBS records can be really sampled. The patches 5-6/6 fix this issue by
>> using "cycles" event instead of PEBS event "cycles:P" to sample guest on
>> Intel platforms.
>>
>> Changes:
>> v1 -> v2:
>> * Free memory allocated by strdup().
>> * Check "--pfm-events" in kvm_add_default_arch_event() as well.
>> * Opportunistically fix the missed memory allocation and free issue in
>> builtin-kwork.
>> * Comments refine.
>>
>>
>> Tests:
>> * Run command "perf kvm record -a && perf kvm report" and "perf kvm
>> top" on Intel Sapphire Rapids platform, guest records can be
>> captured successfully.
>> * Since no powerpc platforms on hand, doesn't check the patches on
>> powerpc. Any test on powerpc is appreciated.
>>
>> Ref:
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220411101946.20262-1-likexu@tencent.com/
>>
>>
>> Dapeng Mi (6):
>> perf tools kvm: Add missed memory allocation check and free
>> perf tools kwork: Add missed memory allocation check and free
>> perf tools kvm: Fix the potential out of range memory access issue
>> perf tools: Add helper x86__is_intel_cpu()
>> perf tools kvm: Use "cycles" to sample guest for "kvm record" on Intel
>> perf tools kvm: Use "cycles" to sample guest for "kvm top" on Intel
>>
>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/kvm-stat.c | 51 +++++++++++
>> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 27 ++++--
>> tools/perf/util/env.c | 22 +++++
>> tools/perf/util/env.h | 2 +
>> tools/perf/util/kvm-stat.h | 10 +++
>> 6 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 6235ce77749f45cac27f630337e2fdf04e8a6c73
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 5:55 [Patch v2 0/6] Perf kvm commands bug fix Dapeng Mi
2025-08-11 5:55 ` [Patch v2 1/6] perf tools kvm: Add missed memory allocation check and free Dapeng Mi
2025-08-11 5:55 ` [Patch v2 2/6] perf tools kwork: " Dapeng Mi
2025-08-11 5:55 ` [Patch v2 3/6] perf tools kvm: Fix the potential out of range memory access issue Dapeng Mi
2025-08-11 5:55 ` [Patch v2 4/6] perf tools: Add helper x86__is_intel_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2025-08-11 5:55 ` [Patch v2 5/6] perf tools kvm: Use "cycles" to sample guest for "kvm record" on Intel Dapeng Mi
2025-08-11 5:55 ` [Patch v2 6/6] perf tools kvm: Use "cycles" to sample guest for "kvm top" " Dapeng Mi
2025-08-15 20:15 ` [Patch v2 0/6] Perf kvm commands bug fix Namhyung Kim
2025-09-03 6:32 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-17 17:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-09-17 21:12 ` Ian Rogers
2025-09-17 23:52 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2025-09-18 19:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-09-19 0:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=189e060b-207b-469f-9b6e-314380d12a42@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).