From: "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make SCSI SG v4 driver enabled by default and remove EXPERIMENTAL dependency, since udev depends on BSG.
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:06:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19036.44270.548043.875878@stoffel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247578141.4310.34.camel@mulgrave.site>
>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:
James> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:38 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 07/13/2009 10:43 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
>> >>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org> writes:
>> >
>> > Dammit, I messed up here sending this patch. I've just edited the
>> > subject line and re-sent it with a bit more description. I think this
>> > patch is perfectly good to go into 2.6.31 right now, esp since it's
>> > not changing code, just whether the code is turned on by default from
>> > now on.
>> >
>>
>> I would like it if you'd also CC stable@kernel.org on this patch. As this
>> condition is already true for distros in the field.
James> The stable tree is for bug *fixes*. Moving an option out from
James> under experimental is basically an enhancement, even if it
James> could be argued it should have been done long ago.
I'm not so sure I agree with this, since this feature is used by UDEV
and has been enabled by default on a bunch of distros for ages (as I'm
told, personally I haven't confirmed this).
But if you object to stable back porting, what are you feelings on
this change for 2.6.31-rc* now? Do you think it needs to be held off
and that it's too late to make this change?
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-14 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-13 19:39 [PATCH 5/5] Make SCSI SG v4 driver enabled by default and remove EXPERIMENTAL dependency, since udev depends on BSG John Stoffel
2009-07-13 19:43 ` John Stoffel
2009-07-14 6:38 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-07-14 13:16 ` John Stoffel
2009-07-14 13:29 ` James Bottomley
2009-07-14 14:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-07-14 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2009-07-14 16:06 ` John Stoffel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-07 15:44 John Stoffel
2009-07-07 15:37 John Stoffel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19036.44270.548043.875878@stoffel.org \
--to=john@stoffel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox