public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	carlos <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: rseq/arm32: choosing rseq code signature
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:29:19 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1933578130.3292.1554928159928.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050734985.2625.1554838340011.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

----- On Apr 9, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:

> Hi Will,
> 
> We are about to include the code signature required prior to restartable
> sequences abort handlers into glibc, which will make this ABI choice final.
> We need architecture maintainer input on that signature value.
> 
> That code signature is placed before each abort handler, so the kernel can
> validate that it is indeed jumping to an abort handler (and not some
> arbitrary attacker-chosen code). The signature is never executed.
> 
> The current discussion thread on the glibc mailing list leads us towards
> using a trap with uncommon immediate operand, which simplifies integration
> with disassemblers, emulators, makes it easier to debug if the control
> flow gets redirected there by mistake, and is nicer for some architecture's
> speculative execution.
> 
> We can have different signatures for each sub-architecture, as long as they
> don't have to co-exist within the same process. We can special-case with
> #ifdef for each sub-architecture and endianness if need be. If the architecture
> has instruction set extensions that can co-exist with the architecture
> instruction set within the same process (e.g. thumb for arm), we need to take
> into account to which instruction the chosen signature value would map (and
> possibly decide if we need to extend rseq to support many signatures).
> 
> Here is an example of rseq signature definition template:
> 
> /*
> * TODO: document trap instruction objdump output on each sub-architecture
> * instruction sets, as well as instruction set extensions.
> */
> #define RSEQ_SIG 0x########
> 
> Ideally we'd need a patch on top of the Linux kernel
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h file that updates
> the signature value, so I can then pick it up for the glibc
> patchset.

Would the following diff work for you ? If so, can I get your
acked-by ?

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h
index 5f262c54364f..1f261ad2ac1b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h
@@ -5,7 +5,17 @@
  * (C) Copyright 2016-2018 - Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
  */
 
-#define RSEQ_SIG       0x53053053
+/*
+ * RSEQ_SIG uses the udf A32 instruction with an uncommon immediate operand
+ * value 0x5305. This traps if user-space reaches this instruction by mistake,
+ * and the uncommon operand ensures the kernel does not move the instruction
+ * pointer to attacker-controlled code on rseq abort.
+ *
+ * The instruction pattern is:
+ *
+ * e7f530f5    udf    #21253    ; 0x5305
+ */
+#define RSEQ_SIG       0xe7f530f5
 
 #define rseq_smp_mb()  __asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" ::: "memory", "cc")
 #define rseq_smp_rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" ::: "memory", "cc")
@@ -78,7 +88,8 @@ do {                                                                  \
                __rseq_str(table_label) ":\n\t"                         \
                ".word " __rseq_str(version) ", " __rseq_str(flags) "\n\t" \
                ".word " __rseq_str(start_ip) ", 0x0, " __rseq_str(post_commit_offset) ", 0x0, " __rseq_str(abort_ip) ", 0x0\n\t" \
-               ".word " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG) "\n\t"                    \
+               ".arm\n\t"                                              \
+               ".inst " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG) "\n\t"                    \
                __rseq_str(label) ":\n\t"                               \
                teardown                                                \
                "b %l[" __rseq_str(abort_label) "]\n\t"


> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Mathieu
> 
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-09 19:32 rseq/arm32: choosing rseq code signature Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-10 20:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2019-04-11 16:42   ` Will Deacon
2019-04-11 17:51     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-11 19:55       ` Peter Maydell
2019-04-15 13:11         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-15 13:30           ` Peter Maydell
2019-04-15 13:37             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-16 13:39               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-17 10:37                 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-04-17 14:43                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-17 15:30                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-18 16:18                       ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-04-11 12:24 ` Florian Weimer
2019-04-15 13:22   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1933578130.3292.1554928159928.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox